Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING <br />November 26, 1984 <br />Page Seven <br />CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - WEBER ADDITION <br />Mr. Kluegel said that the stipulations imposed on the Weber Plat <br />at the June 25, 1984 Council meeting have now been fulfilled. <br />The plat is now really for Council approval. <br />Mr. Reinert asked about the condition of Tomahawk Trail in front <br />of this plat. Mr. Davidson said this has been reconstruction by <br />the contractor. <br />Mr. Marier moved to accept this plat for signatures by the Mayor <br />and City Clerk. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />ENGINEERS REPORT <br />Mr. Davidson said his report will deal with Rice Lake Estates and <br />he will address this under the Attorney's Report. <br />ATTORNEYS REPORT <br />Mr. Hawkins told the Council that one of the original petitioners <br />for municipal services in the Urban Service District #1, Ulmer <br />Construction no longer wants the service extended onto his property. <br />The Council now has to look at some alternatives. <br />Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Schumacher met last week and then discussed <br />the issue with Mr. Davidson and have this proposal: extend the <br />main and install the lift station and interior lines in Rice Lake <br />Estates and an extension of a main to the southerly boundary line <br />of Ulmer's Rice Lake III addition, but not providing interior service <br />at the present time. He proposes that properties that would have <br />the ability to have a direct connection to the system be notified <br />and hold a hearing to see if they are interested in this proposal. <br />The Council would then accept Mr. Davidson's report tonight and <br />set a hearing. <br />Mr. Davidson said the project would be restricted to the plat of <br />Rice Lake Estates and then be extended north to the south line <br />of Ulmer's Rice Lake III Addition. As a result of placing this <br />as an assessment against the Ulmer's Addition as a condition of <br />future platting requiring that sewer be available before those <br />lots be developed, it can be done and is a viable project, but <br />would require another public hearing due to the fact that this <br />property adjacent to the proposed sewer would now be assessed rather <br />than being selective about assessed areas. <br />Mr. Marier pointed out that there will be some• Community Development <br />Block Grant money available for property owners who qualify as <br />low or moderate income or senior citizens whose assessments could <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />