Laserfiche WebLink
22 <br />September 20, 1979 <br />Mr. McLean felt that instead of $25,000 for inspectors, this should be <br />more in the $20,000 range; he understood the City of White Bear paid <br />their full -time inspector, the man who was substantially in charge, <br />$18,000 a year. Marilyn indicated she had put $20,000 in for the in- <br />spector, but Mr. McLean had referred to the combined total for the <br />building inspector, $20,000, and the plumbing inspector, $5,000; he <br />felt this should amount to $20,000 combined. Marilyn said that <br />there was nothing the in the Metro publications for under $20,000. <br />Mr. McLean asked about the SAC charge, and Marilyn explained that the <br />City only processed this, and it did not appear in the budget at a11. <br />Marilyn explained that she had been conservative on the city services, <br />andticipating less building and income from permits, and suggested <br />perhaps abother $5,000 could be added. Mr. Schneider noted that the <br />budget was now down to $34,000 in additional expenses, which was a mil <br />rate of 19.2, as compared to 16.89 last year. Marilyn added that one <br />of the City vehicles, the office car, would be sold next year; Mr. <br />Schneider suggested $200 on the car and $300 on the trailer. In <br />summary, he indicated the budget stood at'19 mils, using the C.I. route <br />for 74,000. This would need to be finalized, and all the figures <br />checked to make sure they were right. He suggested one more meeting <br />before the first Council meeting in October, which would be October 9, <br />at which time the budget would need to be finalized, as it had to be <br />filed October 10. This meeting was set for October 2, at 8pm. Marilyn <br />was asked to work on the budget September 25, 1979. <br />Mr. Schneider brought up three items for discussion in reference to the <br />City Administrator; the employment contract, moving expenses, and in- <br />surance. The City would be looking at a 3 -5 year employment contract, <br />which was nromal due to concern over Council turnover. The Adminstrato <br />could still be dismissed with due casue. A probationary period was <br />discussed, and whether this could be written into the contract, and Mr. <br />Schneider felt there would have to be a clear definition of probationary <br />The move would run about $1,000 to $1,500. Mr. Schneider asked if there <br />was a definate no to any of these considerations, and whether he could <br />be authorized to go ahead. He felt there would have to be some negotiation <br />on the contract. He will indicate he ahs discussed this with the Council <br />and there does not seem to be a problem. <br />Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to adjourn at 9:30 P.M. Mr. McLean seconded the <br />motion. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. <br />These minutes were considered and approved at the regular scheduled <br />Council meeting held on October 22, 1979. <br />Edna L. Sarner, Clerk - Treas. <br />