06/09/1980 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

114 Council Miniutes June 9, 1980 Page 5 line more nearly on the easement. He said that the Anoka County Highway Department had restricted the access to the most north Easterly Tots - these lots would have.to' exit onto the interior street. Mr. Nadeau presented a copy of the RCWB approval of this plat. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to approve this plat. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. This is contingent upon payment of the Park Funds. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McLean moved to authorize the Mayor and the Clerk to sign the plat. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried with Mr. Jaworski voting, No. The final plat of Forest Glen was considered at this time. This had been checked March and there was a need to obtain some land from Sunset Oaks for an additional right -of -way. This had been done. The Country had suggested that the Tots facing Lilac be exited onto the internal streets. All other needed materials are here. The money due for Parks is $12,000.00 Mr. Jaworski moved to approve this plat for signatures, authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the plat upon receipt of the Park money. Seconded by Mr. McLean. There is also a requirement that Lot 1/1, Lot 1/2, Lot 8/2, Lot1/7 face the internal street. Motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing on Land and Oaks was called to order at 9:41 P.M. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Schumacher to bring the Council up to date on the actions to date on this plat. This is platting of the Tots along Main Street East of 135E. There had been general discussion but no decision. The discussion had centered on the right- ofnway requirements along County Road #14. There is 27' for future. County purposes and 30' for a service road to the lots. Mayor Gourley suggested that perhaps more than the 30' would be needed. The planned surface of the service street is 24' . There was some question of the holding pond area. Mr. Tschida said this has been set up in accordance with the requirements of the Rice Creed Watershed Board. There was some discussion of needing to put the utilities in the County right - of -way - would the County then be responsible for replacing City facilities if they are located in the County right -of -way? Mr. Meister felt the County auto- matically replaces any facilities that they disturb. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Meister if the 30' wide street with at 24' driving surface is wide enough for the purposes proposed? Mr. Meister suggested that perhaps this street could abutt the County right -of -way thus leaving more space to one side for City pur- poses. Mayor Gourley questioned the 24' surface for truck traffic -the general consensus of the Council was this right -of -way should be at least 32' in width. Mr. Schumacher questioned what the additional footage would do to the overall size of these lots. He wondered if this would leave enbugh land area in each lot. It was decided That there should be a 32' easement for street right-of- way for the service road to these lots. The possibility of constructing one of the utilities under the street surface. This would require a 40' easement for the service road. This would insure a 10' separation of the water and sewer line. There was discussion as what point in time would this street be needed. Mr. Schumacher said either when the development dictates or when traffic safety de- mands the construction. Mr. Schumacher reported that the Park Board had recommended money in lieu of land. This would compute to $3,000.00 on this plat.