Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2(e <br />October 27, 1980 <br />feasibility study. Mr. Meister, had recommended this be awarded to the low bidder. <br />Mr. Schumacher is in the process of arranging financing for this project and the Andall <br />Street project. This and the Andall project are both 100% assessable. He felt he <br />should have information on this at the next Council meeting. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the low bidder, Orfei & Sons in the amoung of $153,502.20, <br />project to be numbered 80 -81. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motoon carried unanimously. <br />The next item on the agenda was consideration of the financial report for the month of <br />September. Mr. Schumacher went through the items that needed some explanation. Mr. <br />Schumacher felt the financial status is recovering from the slump in the building. <br />Mr. McLean asked for a cash flow projection on a quarterly basis. Mr. Schumacher <br />felt this will be done at the end of this month. This would give the Council some <br />idea of what position this City will be in at the end of the year. <br />Mr. McLean asked if there was to be another budget meeting to be scheduled and Mayor <br />Gourley said that later in the agenda there are some budget cuts proposal for Council <br />consideration. <br />Mr. Nathe's petition for extension of sewers was considered. Mayor Gourley suggested <br />a very brief feasibilty report to be done by the Engineer. A copy of this petition <br />to be sent to Mr. Locher. <br />The next item was the proposed cuts to the budgets. Mr. Schumacher had prepared a <br />schedule. He had also adjusted the anticipated revenues - this will bring the deficit <br />more in line. Mr. Schumahher outlined the areas of his proposed recommendations. <br />With the cuts and the adjusted revenues, the budget shows a surplus of some $800.00. <br />There was discussion on.the matter of having a surplus at the end of year. Mr. McLean <br />was concerned that this figure be planned for and Mr. Schumacher suggested that perhaps <br />the matter of increasing the revenues rather than cutting the services should be con- <br />sidered. <br />After some discussion, a budget hearing was set for November 17, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. <br />The next item was consideration of a salary adjustment for Mr. Volk. This had been <br />provided for March 24, 1980 when,the salary for 1980 had been approved. Mr. Schumacher <br />presented his recommendation and the reasons for this recommendation. Mr. Volk is <br />$178.00 below the Stanton Survey average. Mr. Schumacher recommended that Mr. Volk <br />receive one -half or 89.00 of this for the remainder of the year. <br />Mr. McLean moved to approve this recommendation to be effective Oct. 1, 1980. Se- <br />conded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Under Old Business, the proposed use of the 1981 Federal Revenue Sharing Funds was dis- <br />cussed. A public hearing must be set on this with the stated use being published. <br />Mr. Schumacher recommended these funds be allocated to the Police Department Budget. <br />Mr. Ja‘Norski moved to approve this recommendation. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Still under Old Business, Mayor Gourley pointed ouq that each Council member has a <br />corrected copy of the proposed liquor ordinance. He pointed out several corrections <br />that should be made. Under section 4, Subd. 3, dealing with the fees, the sentence <br />"that the Council may change the fees from time to time by Council Resolution." Mayor <br />Gourley also pointed out that the fee for an On -Sale license has been increased to <br />