Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM 3B <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration <br />MEETING DATE: 22 October 2007 <br />TOPIC: Resolution 07 -185 <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Telephone companies want to provide video services. However, they have stated that they believe the <br />current franchising process takes too long and that cities serve as barriers to entry into the market. As <br />such they are lobbying state and federal government hard to change laws to benefit them in the video <br />service marketplace. <br />The FCC recently approved a "Report and Order" that only allows local franchising authorities 90 days <br />to negotiate a franchise for a phone company to provide video service. The new guideline became <br />effective on August 6, 2007. <br />The North Metro Telecommunications Commission (NMTC) approved "Policies and Procedures" for <br />accepting applications for competitive franchises in December 2006. The policies and procedures take <br />into account Minnesota Statute 238 and the new regulatory guidelines indicated in the FCC's "Report <br />and Order." The Policies and Procedures simplify and streamline the application process, challenging <br />the argument that cities serve as a barrier to entry in the market. With an Additional Franchise <br />Template for video service competitors, the franchise application, negotiation, and approval process <br />would be greatly hastened. <br />The "Model Additional Franchise Template" is based on the existing franchise with Comcast. It <br />maintains a "level playing field" and considers community needs and interests, but it also addresses <br />technological changes and the new regulatory framework. When drafting the document, the NMTC's <br />legal counsel carefully considered Minnesota Statute 238, the recent FCC "Report and Order" and the <br />existing franchise. The most significant changes include the sections regarding PEG and I -NET <br />support. The new document was written so that competitive providers will provide equivalent support for <br />PEG on a per- subscriber, pro -rata basis. New providers would also have to provide an equivalent <br />investment in an I -NET, whether that is an additional non - duplicative I -NET, or the equivalent cost of an <br />I -NET paid on a per- subscriber, pro -rata basis. The additional franchise also indicates various fees that <br />will NOT be deducted from franchise fees. This change was necessitated by language in the FCC's <br />"Report and Order" that could be interpreted to allow a franchise holder to offset certain costs and fees <br />against franchise fee payments. <br />The NMTC reviewed and approved the "Model Additional Franchise Template" at their August 15, 2007 <br />meeting. The Operations Committee has also reviewed the document. Both groups recommend that <br />the individual cities pass a resolution approving the template franchise. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />1. Approve Resolution 07 -185 Approving a Model Competitive Franchise Agreement. <br />2. Deny Resolution 07 -185 <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Number One. <br />