Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/24/1986 Council Minutes1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order by Mayor Benson at 7:05 P.M. Members present: Marier, Bisel, Bohjanen and Reinert. City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Ad- ministrator, Randy Schumacher; Engineers, Bob Toddie and John Davidson; Public Works Director, Don Volk; Building Official, Pete Kluegel and Clerk - Treasurer, Marilyn Anderson were also present. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES - WORK SESSION, MARCH 10, 1986 Mr. Reinert moved to approve these minutes as presented. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - MARCH 10, 1986 Mr. Marier moved to approve these minutes as presented. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS - MARCH 24, 1986 Mr. Reinert moved to approve the Disbursements as presented. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Benson asked if the six handbooks for Council members had been ordered. Mrs. Anderson said they have been ordered. OPEN MIKE A. Mary Hauser, Metropolitan Council Representative - Ms. Hauser appeared before the Council and explained she did not come with a presentation but would rather answer questions from the Council. She did explain that Metropolitan Council is updating its frame- work and preparing forecasts that at present indicate that there will not be significant growth in the metro area. Currently the state legislature is considering making Metro Council more of a planning entity and taking away some of its operational powers. Mayor Benson pointed out his concern regarding developers who are asking that areas just outside the MUSA line be developed with municipal facilities. Ms. Hauser explained that the Metro- politan Council still would like to hold to a four per forty acre density. The Council prefers development in a planned manner. It would be more advantageous to have adjoining areas developed rather than leap frog. Mr. Schumacher noted that several years ago the Metropolitan Council published a brief summary of happenings with Metropolitan Council entitled "Brief" or something in that line. This publi- cation has been discontinued making it difficult to determine what is happening at Metro. Ms. Hauser suggested that the "Metro Monitor" could help in this area. 029 030 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Two Mr. Marier asked if Ms. Hauser was aware of any funds being awarded for -anything in Lino Lakes. Ms. Hauser said money has been allocated for the Chain of Lakes Park but was not aware •of•the dollar amount.' She told Mr. Marier she will find out the amount.. Mayor Benson noted the City is currently updating its Compre- hensive Lanka Use Plan: This process is difficult because the City is not aware of Metropolitan Councils intent for the next four or five years. He asked if there were individuals who could. aid the City in this area. Ms. Hauser said there are people in the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment Department who would be helpful.. Mr. 4Jim Shetler.will be attending the next Comprehensive Plan Update Meeting. Mr. Reinert asked if the Metropolitan Council has developed a grant and /or loan program for solid waste management and re cycling. Ms. Hauser explained that such a program is being developed for abatement .programs. Municipalities are eligible for participation in this program. . However, this program ad- dresses abatement.not how waste is collected. Mr. Schumacher explained that Lino Lakes staff is currently developing a compost program and the staff has attended the Metropolitan Council area seminars dealing with waste abatement. Mayor Benson thanked Ms. Hauser for attending this evening. He explained to her that the City is developing an Economic " Development Program and may peed guidance from Metropolitan Council in this area. 1 1 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING A MEMBER FOR THE ANOKA COUNTY JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT - COUNCIL Mr. Bisel noted Mr. Andy. Neal is on the Citizen Advisory Board for the medium security prison and stated this would be a com- patible position. Mr. Bisel moved to appoint Mr. Neal to the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council. Mr. Marier seconded the motion. Motion carried with Mr. Reinert voting, no. Mr. Bisel moved to send .a letter to Mr. Vernon Swanson for his past service on this Board. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION #86 -05, SUPPORTING CONTINUATION OF REGISTRATION WITH SELECTIVE SERVICE Mr. Reinert moved to adopt Resolution #86 -05. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mrs. A-nder- son read the Resolution. 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Three CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION #86 - 05 - 031 WHEREAS, the continuation of the program for peacetime registration for the Selective Service System contributes to national readiness by reducing the time required for a full defense mobilization; and WHEREAS, over one million United States citizens have sacrificed their lives to protect the rights and freedoms of all Americans and registration for Selective Service is an integral part of current preparedness to preserve these rights and freedoms in the future; and WHEREAS, more than 96 percent of potential registrants have registered with the Selective Service System since the resumption of registration and by so registering have enhanced United States national defense preparedness; and WHEREAS, the Selective Service System has been tasked with assisting in the process of improving our readiness by calling upon eighteen year old male citizens to comply with the law by simply registering their name, address, date of birth and social security number at the Post Office within thirty days of their eighteenth birthday; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Lino Lakes City Council does hereby support continuation of registration with Selective Service and does hereby declare April, 1986 as REGISTRATION AWARENESS MONTH. Adopted by the Council this 24th day of March, 1986. Mar'ilyn'G. Anderson, City Clerk 032 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Four PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF SHOREVIEW SEWER RATE INCREASE The public hearing was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Mayor Benson. Mr. Schumacher explained the users on this system are charged according to the Shoreview rates and again this year Shoreview has raised its rates approximately 2%. The proposal is to pass the Shoreview rate increase to the users, thereby increasing their rates 2%: Mrs. Apitz, owner of J & K Liquors, questioned why she is paying a commercial rate when she is not required to provide restroom facilities for the public. Mr. Schumacher explained the rate she is being charged was determined by the Shoreview engineer. Mr. Marier directed the City Administrator to contact Shoreview and ask them to inspect Mrs. Apitz' facility and ask for a re- classification. Mr. Marier moved to close the public hearing at 7:39 P.M. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Marier moved to approve the increase in sewer rates as in- dicated in a memorandum to the Council dated February, 1986 and subject to checking Mrs. Apitz' rates with Shoreview. Mr. Boh- janen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING - 4TH AVENUE INFORMATIONAL HEARING Mayor Benson opened the public hearing at 7:40 P.M. Mr. John Davidson gave the background on why this area is being consi- dered for improvement. Mr. Toddie explained the improvements consist of managing the drainage of the area between Main Street and Lilac Street and upgrading 4th Avenue to MSA standards. Mr. Paul Ruud, Anoka County Engineer, explained the County is proposing to improve Main Street during the summer of 1986 and will be using some of the facilities of this project. Mr. Andy Cardinal explained he is a manager on the Rice Creek Watershed District Board (RCWD) and the District is interested in working with the City and the County to provide a decent drainage for this area. Mr. Marvin Tews - 7919 4th Avenue. Mr. Tews said it appeared to him that the plan as presented will bring all the water into his land. He noted County Ditch #22 was not operational. 1 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Five Mr. Neal Benjamin - 466 Main Street. Mr. Benjamin noted that if the ditch is not adequate to handle the incoming flow, the water will backflow to the east. Mr. Toddie explained drainage patterns will not be changed. However, Ditch #22 will be ade- quately cleaned and maintained. Mr. Neil Toenjes 7810 Lois Lane asked about the holding pond on th'e south end of Sherwood Green. Mr. Toddie explained it would overflow into the 4th Avenue ditch. Mr. Clayton Wendt - 391 Thomas Street. Mr. Wendt asked where the breaking point was between the north and south flow, are there elevations? Mr. Toddie pointed out the area on his map and told Mr. Wendt he could get elevations after this hearing. Mrs. Shirley Wise - 7999 4th Avenue. Mrs. Wise asked what exactly the City was doing. Mr. Toddie explained this was a plan for controlled drainage. Pat Antinozzi - 7969 Lois Lane - asked why not drain both the north and south pond on Sherwood Green. Mr. Toddie explained this would be very expensive. Mr. Stan Wise - 7770 4th Avenue - Mr. Wise asked how deep the ditch would be near the south pond in Sherwood Green. Mr. Toddie explained 4i to 5 feet from the centerline of the road. Mr. Wise asked who would be responsible for the trees that need to be re- moved. It was explained the City would have to negotiate an ad- ditional 17 foot right -of -way in the area where he lives. Mr. John Guse - 399 Thomas Street asked about drainage down Thomas Street. Mr. Toddie explained. Mrs. Suzanne Wise - 7999 4th Avenue asked what is going to happen in front of her house. Mr. Toddie explained the street will be lowered to provide better drainage, curb, gutter and storm sewer will be installed as well as the urban section street. Her trees should not be affected. Mr. John LeBlond - 7865 4th Avenue noted the area that is proposed to contain the large drainage pipe on his property is all low land. Will this installation increase his water problem. Mr. Toddie said, no. Mr. LeBlond could tie into this pipe to provide more drainage for his property. There was a question on how water from Lois Lane would get anywhere. Mr. Davidson explained the catch basins will have to be relocated and this is the responsibility of the developer of Sherwood Green. 033 034 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Six Mrs. Julie LeBlond - 7865 4th Avenue asked if costs can be discussed tonight as well as methods of payment for this im- provement. Mayor Benson explained that the plans have not yet progressed that far. Costs are still being determined as well as how much Anoka County and RCWD will share in these costs. Mr. Donald Shackle - 7961' 4th Avenue told the Council he has some ponds on his property and when they get high they drain south. Mr. Toddie explained that RCWD has looked at the ponds and has determined that they are beyond the limits of this pro- ject. Mr. Pete Willenbring, Engineer for the RCWD, explained that he has completed a capacity analysis of Ditch #22 and has deter- mined that the ditch would be inadequate to handle the proposed project. He noted that the RCWD would be willing to respond to petitions for a repair and improvement project. Mr. Willenbring further explained the history of the Ditch and told the Council the Ditch actually belongs to the people who originally constructed it. Mr. David Allen - 7830 Lois Lane asked how do you determine who is benefited by this project. Mr. Willenbring explained it is the RCWD theory that an improvement to the ditch is necessary to effectively drain the area. A study would be made to determine who is benefitted. Mayor Benson was asked if the City has petitioned RCWD to im- prove Ditch #22. Mayor Benson explained the City has not yet petitioned because the City is not sure how RCWD is viewing the project. Mr. Willenbring said the RCWD has done some calculations on the ditch to determine what capacity is needed. By using in- formation supplied by the City Engineers it was determined the Ditch would require a capacity of 80 to 90 cubic feet per second (CFS). In its present condition it can handle approximately five to eight CFS. Mr. Willenbring said the RCWD has some very limited funds avail- able to clean out obstructions. However, the RCWD has determined just cleaning out the obstructions or even returning the ditch to its original configuration will not provide the needed capacity. The RCWD has determined a petition for improvement is required. Mayor Benson asked if some of the waterways maintenance funds could be used in this area. Mr. Willenbring explained Lino Lakes has contributed under $4,000 in the last ten years to this fund and that much alone has already been expended for the studies conducted on Ditch #22. 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Seven Mr. Marier asked Mr. Willenbring if he has checked with other governments to be sure of the figures he was quoting. Mr. Willenbring said he was positive of his figures. Mr. Marier also said that RCWD has taken the responsibility for ditch maintenance away from Anoka County and does levy ditch main- tenance funds from Lino Lakes residents. Presently maintenance is required on Ditch #22 and he is askineRCWD to take the re- sponsibility of maintaining the ditch and then the City can determine what additional flowage is necessary. Mr. Petrangelo explained that the RCWD is an administrative board and gave details on how it collects $15,000.00 a year to maintain 122 miles of ditches in various municipalities. He also explained that RCWD has used some of these maintenance funds to review the problem in the area of Ditch #22 and have made a determination on how the problem can be rectified. Mr. Petrangelo said he would go on record to support a partial cost of the repair of this ditch once the final cost is determined. The RCWD is interested in getting the drainage problem solved and Mr. Petrangelo also wanted it known this would not be a cheap project. He also indicated the petition for improvement could come from either the affected property owners or the City Council. Once the petition is received, the final cost will be determined. At this point RCWD has not received a formal pe- tition. Mr. Schumacher outlined what had happened regarding petitions and resolutions to this point. Mr. Reinert asked if the RCWD receives a petition and determines the cost of the project do they. then assess the property owners? Mr. Willenbring explained that is the case, the RCWD would re- ceive the petition, determine the cost of the improvement, conduct a study to determine who the benefited property owners are, call a public hearing, determine what the County will pay and what the RCWD will pay, and if there is a balance then this could be assessed to the property owners. Mayor Benson asked Mr. Petrangelo if he could give an estimate of how much the RCWD could commit to. Mr. Petrangelo said he felt it would probably be more than a tenth, probably even one - fourth. A gentleman asked for a cost estimate for improving Ditch #22. Mr. Petrangelo said they only have very preliminary information at this point, but this information would be available in plenty of time. Mr. Alan Robinson who owns the sod farm north of Main Street told the Council his family cleaned the entire length of Ditch #22 from Main Street to 35W in 1951 for a cost just over $20,000.00. The ditch next to Mr. Tews was not cleaned at that time. Mr. Robinson said today this project would cost probably 50 times this 035 036 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Eight figure. Mr. Willenbring gave some cost estimates based on water flow but indicated these were very preliminary figures. A gentleman from the audience asked what the CFS figures indi- cate. Mr. Davidson explained. Mr. Marier moved to close' the public hearing at 8:57 P.M. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Council took a twenty minute break so additional questions could be asnwered by the engineers. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - UL!JER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - REZONE. ORDINANCE NOS 86 -01 Mayor Benson opened the public hearing at 9:20 P.M. Mr. Kluegel explained this is a replat of the existing Ulmers Rice Lake Addition III and a rezone from Expansion Residential (ER) to R -1. Mr. Ulmer is proposing to build one hundred seven single family homes to be serviced by municipal sewer and water. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is within the MUSA area. The park dedication was paid when the area was platted as Ulmers Rice Lake Addition III. The Planning and Zoning Board have recommended approval subject to obtaining the necessary RCWD and Department of Natural Resources permits and deeds for the required street right -of -way. The Planning and Zoning Board's basis of approval is that the pre- liminary plat complies with the subdivision design standards and conforms to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mrs. Cheryl Nelson of 7073 Rice Lake Drive indicated her lot is of the lots that will be required to give a 30' roadway ease- on the back of her lot to Ulmer Construction if a full width t >�r et is to be constructed. She is concerned because if she gives the easement the balance of her lot will not be large enough to subdivide. She is also concerned with who will pay the assess- ment across the back of her lot as well as the connection charges. Mr. Toddie explained it was up to the developer to provide an adequate street right -of -way. Mr. Ulmer said it was his position that it is the City's responsibility to negotiate the right -of -way since the City has the ultimate right to eminent domain. He noted moving the street is not an alternative because he would loose some lots and that would make the plat too expensive to market. Mr. Ulmer said he would be willing to pay for the installation of the street in exchange for the right -of -way. 1 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Nine Mr. Schumacher asked Mr. Ulmer if he had contacted any of the property owners. Mr. Ulmer said he had not done this, he be- lieves the City should do this. Mr. Paul Haider said no one has asked the lot owners if they wish to give the right -of -way easement. Mrs. Nelson said there would be problems if some owners wanted to give the right -of -way and some others did not. She also asked what would the Council's attitude be if the lot owners gave the right -of -way and then at some time in the future decide to divide their lots. Would the Council give variances to lot sizes since their lots would be substandard. Mayor Benson said he could not speak for future Councils but did note that lot size requirements could change during the interim. Mayor Benson asked Mr. Ulmer why he did not reserve the right -of -way prior to selling the lots. Mr. Ulmer said he had not planned on completing the street. Mr. Bohjanen moved to close the public hearing at 9:40 P.M. M Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kluegel explained that although the Planning and Zoning Board did recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to obtain- ing the proper right -of -way easements, they did not address the issue of how to obtain the right -of -way easement. He also noted that an EAW is not required for this plat. Mr. Bisel moved to approve the Preliminary Plat based upon the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendations and based on the reason that the plat complies to the subdivision regulations. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Mr. Hawkins told the Council they should clarify the street ease- ment issue prior to accepting the Preliminary Plat since resolving this issue could be costly to the City. Mr. Ulmer said he would not negotiate easements and would develop the Ulmers Rice Lake Addition III as now platted. Mayor Benson explained that the lot owners will have to make a decision because if they do not grant the easement they cannot resubdivide their lots. Mr. Bisel withdrew his motion and Mr. Bohjanen withdrew his second for the motion. Mayor Benson asked Mr. Ulmer to talk to the seven lot owners who would be required to give the right -of -way. Mr. Ulmer asked how 037 038 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Ten long would it be before Council approved the plans and speci- fications. Mayor Benson said they could be approved at the next Council Meeting. Mr. Bohjanen moved to table this item until the next Council Meeting to allow Mr. Ulmer time to contact the seven lot owners to obtain street right -of-way easements. Mr. Marier seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. REZONE. ULMER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. ORDINANCE #86 - 01. FIRST READING Mr. Marier moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance #86 - 01 and dispense with the reading. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 86 - 01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) I, The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, does ordain: Ordinance No. 2 of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on May 24, 1983 is hereby amended by rezoning from Expansion Residential (ER) to Single Family Residential (R1), pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: The Southeast (SE) quarter of the Northeast (NE) quarter of section 19, Township 31, Range 22 except lots 18, 19, 20, and 22, Block 2, Ulmer's Rice Lake Addition III. II. Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 2 shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Eleven This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to City Charter. Passed by the City Council this day of , 1986. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer PLANNING AND ZONING REPORT - PETER KLUEGEL A. Conditional Use Permit Advertising Billboard Sign - Schubert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. Mr. Kluegel said this proposed sign is to be located on the Roger Acton property adjacent to 35E. The property is zoned Light Industrial (LI). The proposed sign meets all the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance and the Planning and Zoning Board have recommended approval. Mr. Bisel explained that the Planning and Zoning Board had given this item good consideration and moved to approve the application. Mr. Marier seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Metes and Bounds Conveyance, House Move -In - Emmett Solberg. Mr. Kluegel explained Mr. Solberg has requested to subdivide ten acres with 330' of frontage from his present sixty acre parcel in the Rural zone. This property is located on 20th Avenue. The second portion of this request is for a house move -in. The house is presently located in New Brighton and is a three bedroom ramb- ler with a two car garage. The house meets City Codes and it is recommended that a mound type septic system be required. The Planning and Zoning Board has recommended approval of both of these requests because it is consistent with both the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The Park fee of $160.00 is required and the Planning and Zoning Board has recommended a shallow basement because of the high ground water. 039 040 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Twelve Mr. Marier was concerned about the drainage tile that runs across this property from 35E to 20th Avenue. He asked that the tile be exposed so that it will not be crushed when the house is moved onto the site., Mr. Reinert was concerned about the high ground water. He asked that Mr. Kluegel be on site during the construction of the mound septic system to see that it will be properly installed. Mr. Bisel moved to approve these requests with the stipulation that the drain tile be located and if there is damage done to the tile Mr. Solberg will repair it at his expense and he takes care of the driveway drop as necessary. Mr. Marier seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Conditional Use Permit - Temporary Advertising Sign - Voyageur Log Homes. Mr. Kluegel explained this request is for a 4' x 8' advertising sign to be located on the roof of a 10' x 20' log structure on the Forrest Tagg property near the intersection of Lake Drive but facing 35W. The property is zoned Light Industrial and all set backs have been met. The Planning and Zoning Board did recommend approval of this request with the stipulation that it be removed by September 1, 1986. Mr. Schumacher noted that both the sign and log structure are presently in place and noted approving this would be after the fact as well as setting a precedence. He reminded the Council that a similar request for a sign on a truck trailer had been denied. This may violate the uniform code. Mr. Reinert moved to deny this request because it appears to be precedent setting. Mr. Marier seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. At 10:10 P.M. Mr. Bohjanen moved to extend the Council Meeting for another thirty minutes. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Site and Building Plan Review - Golf Driving Range - Kenneth Tritten. Mr. Kluegel explained that this request is for the installation of a golf driving range in the Rural zone on land owned by Donald Lundgren east of Holly Drive on Ash Street. The driving range will be on five acres leased from Mr. Lundgren for five years. The proposal includes a 14' x 24' club house, no outside lighting and a landscaping plan. This is a permitted use in the Rural zone. Anoka County has approved the traffic pattern. The property is currently being farmed. 1 1 1 1 1 041 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Thirteen Mr. Reinert was concerned because sanitation facilities consist of satellites. It was determined that this is what is normally used at golf driving ranges and Mr. Tritten said that if after several years it appears this will be a profitable situation and he is able to purchase the land from Mr. Lundgren he will install a septic system. Mr. Kluegel has checked with PCA and they felt satellites are acceptable. Mr. Marier moved to approve the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board and approved the Site and Building Plan Review for Mr. Tritten. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kluegel reported that Mr. Swistowski has removed his sign and Mr. Roland Ford is progressing in cleaning up his property. ENGINEER'S REPORT - BOB TODDIE A. Feasibility Study for Ulmer's Rice Lake 4th Addition. Mr. Toddie has completed the feasibility study for this project. He noted that part of the project is construction of trunk water mains and sewer mains that interfaces with the Rice Lake Estates project. These mains are designed to service the entire area of approximately 500 acres. Based on the figures presented in the written report, Mr. Toddie deems the project to be feasible. Mr. Toddie is proposing that a portion of the project not be assessed against Mr. Ulmer since the project is designed to ser- vice an area larger than Mr. Ulmer's plat. This portion could be deferred or financed by connection charges. If the total cost were to be levied against Ulmers 4th Addition the project may not be feasible. Mr. Davidson concurred with Mr. Toddie and noted that this project differs from the Rice Lake Estate project because the Rice Lake Estate project was at a dead end area whereas Mr. Ulmers subdivision is at the beginning of the area to be served. B. Accepting Feasibility Report and Authorizing Plans and Specifications - Resolution No. 86 - 07., Mayor Benson told the Council that if the Ulmer's Rice Lake Addition #4 plat is approved on April 14, 1986 plans and specifications can be approved at that time as well as the Resolution. C. Consideration and Approval of Circle Pines Joint Water Service Agreement. Mr. Toddie had prepared a revision of this draft to include language that Mr. Volk has suggested regarding contaminated wells. Mr. Toddle has not received a proposal draft from Circle Pines. 04..E COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Fourteen Mr. Hawkins was concerned with item number six of the proposed draft regarding termination of the agreement. Mr. Hawkins will forward his comments to the administrator's office before the next Council Meeting. D. Rice Lake Estates Well - Mr. Toddie asked the Council for permission to drill a test well to determine if there is a Jor- don aquifer in this area. If it is not there the well will have to be drilled to the Mt. Simon aquifer which would require a much larger starting hole for the well. The cost of the test well would be from $2,000 to $3,000. Mr. Marier moved to go to the Jordon - or approve the drilling of a test well. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. E. 4th Avenue Projects - Mr. Toddie will be dealing with the RCWD and the County and will be giving them the capacity that will be required for this project and will be determining what type of a system will be needed for this area. He expects to get this information to'the RCWD engineers in just a few days. Mr. Bohjanen asked if it be determined how large an area would be served if Ditch #22 were cleaned. Mr. Toddie said the RCWD engineer has determined the capacity to be seven CFS if the ditch were cleaned. This would be far less than what the area contributes to the ditch. The drainage area is about 1,600 acres. ATTORNEY'S REPORT - BILL HAWKINS Mr. Hawkins did not have a report tonight. OLD BUSINESS A. License Conditions for L & G Rehbein for the Distribution of Lime - Mrs. Anderson has checked with Anoka County who issued the license to L & G Rehbein. Mr. Jon Christenson has investi- gated the concerns raised by the Council regarding sludge being stockpiled on the 20th Avenue site and has determined there is a violation of the license provisions. Mr. Christianson has notified the contractor that continued violation will result in suspension of the license. He also told Mrs. Anderson that he did not have the staff to adequately inspect these types of operations. The Council expressed concern over the lack of routine inspections of this concern. There were several suggestions including the City perform the inspections and charge the County. There was also concern expressed regarding what materials were contained in the sludge and its potential harmful effects. 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1986 Page Fifteen Mr. Reinert moved to request the County to cancel L & G Rehbein License until they are in a better position to test and monitor what is being hauled into Lino Lakes. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. As it reached 11:00 P.M.,Mr. Bohjanen moved to adjourn. Mr. Marier seconded the' motion. Aye Items under Old Business, B through D and all of the New Business will be carried to the April 14, 1986 agenda. These minutes were considered and approved by a regular meeting of the Council on April 14, 1986. Marilyn'G. Anderson, City Clerk •en .min :en n, ayor 0-4 3,