04/28/1986 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

064 l e Seven COUNCIL MEETING April 28, 1986 Mr. Bisel moved to approve the 1985 audit. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Mr. Marier asked that a report be submitted to the Council with regard to the status of assessment payments. He suggested that the Council take necessary e Yrevie. of each quarterly report to deter delinquency after review Council not do further business with Y with also delinquent the record. parties with a delinquent OLD BUSINESS 1 Update on L & G Rehbein Lime Sludge Licens the validity of a letter dated 4/18/86 from Mr. Hutichison,�uAnokaned County with regard to the lime sludge issue. Mr. Bohjanen moved to have Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Kluegel and Mr. Volk visit the site referred to in the 4/18/86 letter and determine the lime sludge situation. Mr. Marier seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Special Council Meeting for May 5, 1986 - Ulmer Preliminary Plat - Mr. Schumacher reported that the purpose of the May 5, 1986 meeting was to meet with Ulmer's engineer particularly regarding the alter- natives for the ponding area. The residents of the area were also invited to attend. Ulmer's engineer has stated that he will be unable to make that particular date and su The alternate dates su ggested alternate dates. Schumacher was instructedstodarrangeoa mutually satisfactorCouncil. date Mr. and notify all involved. Y ate Rolland Ford Update - Mr. Kluegel updated the Council on the status of the cleanup on the Ford property. Mr. Ford did not meet the judges order to clean up the property by April 15, and therefore, the City is going through the nuisance abatement procedure as required by the ordinance. Mayor Benson asked why the delay in going this procedure when Mr. Ford was given a final date forccompletiongh of April 15. Mr. Hawkins stated that legally the procedure must be followed. Richard Klenck - Complaint of Improper Excavation - Mr. Kluegel explained that one of Mr. Klenck's neighbors wrote a letter of complaint regarding the excavating going on at the Klenck property. In responding to the complaint, Mr. Kluegel inspected the area in question and found that Mr. Klenck has obtained the proper permits and has a conditional use permit and is satisfying the conditions of those permits. Mr. Klenck also has a petition 18 neighbors stating they have no complaiintaboutfthe activity- - the 18th neighbor is the neighbor who has complained. Mr. Klenck stated that the problem is simply a neighbor feud. Mr. Marier moved to have the city staff respond to the complaint with a letter explaining that the Building Official has checked out the situation and activity appears to be satisfying the necessary permits. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 1