Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />COUNCIL METT1NG <br />.June 9, 1986 <br />Page Six <br />Could Lino Lakes residents request a wider driveway <br />apron than the planned 12 feet? <br />A Yes, the residents will be contacted at the time of <br />construction and any additional charges would be borne <br />by the resident. <br />MOTION: Mr. Bohjanen moved to close the public hearing at <br />8:12 P.M. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion which carried <br />unanimously. <br />Mayor Benson explained to those in the audience that now the <br />City is required to wait for ,60 days and if no petition to <br />the contrary is received within that period, the City will <br />go ahead with the project. He also reminded the residents <br />to get together and decide upon the sidewalk issue and <br />submit a petition if sidewalk is desired. <br />CONSIDERATION OF UPDATING EQUIPMENT RATE CHANGES FOR 1986 <br />Mr. Volk explained that the schedule of equipment rates <br />which he has proposed would be what he considers fair.and <br />reasonable after reviewing the rates used by other <br />surrounding cities with like equipment. These charges would <br />be what the City would collect if the equipment were <br />"rented" by another government agency or in the case of an <br />emergency only by a private party. He explained that <br />currently the City operates under the policy that the <br />City -owned equipment is not rented" to a private party, but <br />that the Minnesota Public Works Association is working on a <br />emergency disaster aid policy which will define when it is <br />appropriate to allow a private party to use the City <br />equipment. <br />MOTION: Mr. Bohjanen moved to approve the proposed <br />equipment rate schedule presented by Mr. Volk. Mr. Bisel <br />seconded the motion which carried unanimously. <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING AN ASSESSOR FOR 1986/198" <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that appointing an assessor <� <br />annual formality and that the present assessor, Mary <br />hotsum is willing to complete another assessment year for <br />S12,676 which is the figure negotiated by the Ways and Means <br />Committee and approved by the last Council meeting. Mrs. <br />Roisum has suggested that if new single family construction <br />exceeds 150 units during the year that the Ways and Means <br />Committee re- evaluate her work load and adjust her <br />compensation accordingly. <br />The Board discussed the number of new single family units <br />during the past few years. The figure of 150 units is <br />somewhat higher than has been experienced during the past <br />few years. The consensus of the Board was to deal with the <br />113 <br />