08/11/1986 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

157 COUNCIL MEETING August 11, 1986 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7:04 P.M., August 11, 1986 by Mayor Benson. Members present: Marier, Bisel, Bohjanen, Reinert. Members absent: None. City Attorney,' Bill Hawkins; Engineer, Ron Stallberg; Building Inspector, Pete Kluegel: Public Works Director, Don Volk; Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk - Treasurer, Marilyn Anderson were also present. CONSIDERATION AND APROVAL OF MINIJTES - JULY 28, 1986 Mr. Marier moved to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried with Mr. Bisel abstaining. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS July 31, 1986 - Mr. Bohjanen moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unani- mously. August 11, 1986 - Mr. Marier moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Mr. Bisel seconded the mc'ion. Motion carried unani- mously. OPEN MIKE Dave Hanson, 7834 Knoll Drive - Mr. Hanson appeared to inform the Council of some building code violations that had'occurred when his Ihouse was built earlier this year. Mr. Hanson was concerned about the septic system installed by Perry Excavating. The drainfield was located within forty feet of the well which is illegal and m ay cause .a health hazard. He has tried to work with the installer but the installer will not pay for a lift station that will be required or restoration of the lawn. IJudith Seekon, 899 Main Street - Mrs. Seekon was concerned because she had heard the City Council was considerating placing restrictions on what videos local video stores may rent. She wanted to express Mr. Kluegel told the Council that Perry Excavating is willing to install a whole new system however there is not an agreement on the other costs. Mr. Hanson questioned whether or not the City could fine the contractor for violating city codes or possibly pull his contractor's license. Mr. Hawkins said that the City does provide inspections but does not incur any liability because of issuing a permit. He explained Mr. Kluegel can determine if the City Code has been violated and even pursue the matter of collecting the penalty and revoking the contrac- tor's license. The City does keep the penalty in this case. He further explained Mr. Hanson could pursue his claim against the contractor through civil court. Mr. Schumacher will follow up on this matter through Mr. Kluegel deter- mining if City Code has been violated and determining appropriate action and inform Mr. Hanson what has been determined.