10/13/1986 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MEETING II October 13, 1986 Page Eight Mr. Kluegel explained that the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this request with the stipulation set out in Mr. Toddie's letter. Mayor Benson suggested adding the stipulation that the yard match. Mr. Bisel asked if the neighbors would go along with these recommendations. Mr. McKosy said his real concern was with the street. Mayor Benson said this issue will be dealt with at a later date. Mr. Marier asked Mr. Nelson if he had a problem with matching the driveway with the neighbors. Mr. Nelson said yes. Mayor Benson said the engineer had addressed this issue. Mr. Stahlberg said that if positive drainage is provided for the driveway so that water is not dumped on the neighbors, the elevation of the driveway is not a concern. There will be run -off regardless of the elevation. However, yards will match better if the grade of the lot is reduced. Mayor Benson asked Mr. Kluegel if he would have a problem keeping contact with the contractor during construction of a berm. Mr. Kluegel said no problem, the berm was a condition outlined in Mr. Toddie's letter. He felt there would be no adverse effects to the neighbors if Mr. Toddie's recommendations were followed. Mayor Benson asked Mr. Nelson if he would have a problem matching the driveway to the neighbors driveway? Mr. Nelson said yes, the proposed elevation for this driveway is higher than the neighbors but felt that would not be a problem since storm water run -off was being controlled. Mr. Marier moved to deny the conditional use permit until the con- tractor can meet the request of the neighbor property owners and the engineer's request. Motion died for a lack of a second. Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Nelson if he could meet the objectives as presented. Mr. Nelson said he could meet the requirements of the engineer as stated. Mr. Reinert asked if this would satisfy the neighbors. Mr. McKosy said no, his lot is considerably higher than the lots on either side, he is only asking that the elevations be nearly the same height. Mr. Reinert asked how can the neighbors be appeased? Mr. McKosy said they would be appeased if the concerns of the property elevations are met. Mr. Nelson felt his proposal would not be inconsistant as it now is planned. Mr. Bisel moved to continue the public hearing to the next Council meeting and asked Mr. Nelson to present elevations showing the new house will be consistant with the neighborhood. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE #09 - 86, FIRST READING - AMENDING HOME RULE CHARTER, FILING DATE 1 1