My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-27-14 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2014
>
10-27-14 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2015 1:46:39 PM
Creation date
10/29/2014 10:55:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/27/2014
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 13, 2014 <br />DRAFT <br />l CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE : October 13, 2014 <br />5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED : 9:05 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Kusterman, <br />8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development <br />13 Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Deputy Public Safety Director <br />14 Kelly McCarthy; Public Safety Director John Swenson; Finance Director Al Rolek; City <br />15 Clerk Julie Bartell <br />16 <br />17 Agenda <br />18 <br />19 1. Fire House No. 2, Preliminary Site and Building Plans — Public Safety Director <br />20 John Swenson introduced Quinn Hutson of CNH Architects and firm representative <br />21 Brooke Jacobson. Mr. Hutson reviewed the preliminary site and building plans for the <br />22 fire station, including space needs, an update on site development (including soil <br />23 conditions, wetlands and engineering), an overall site plan (including future uses of the <br />24 facility and the surrounding property), and the preliminary site plan of the station property <br />25 itself. He noted the possibility of including training features in the development and the <br />26 benefits of doing so. He reviewed three building design options. Option A is the most <br />27 basic option but it would meet national standards for fire facilities. This option would be <br />28 smaller in square footage than the city's current Fire Station No. 1. Option B would be <br />29 larger and include items for additional functions such as training, offices, and a day room. <br />30 Option C, the largest facility, includes the most facilities including a public area <br />31 (community room) and dorms and an added training function with a tower and a second <br />32 level. The council then reviewed the cost estimates for the three options. Mr. Hutson <br />33 explained that the cost estimates include site work, soil work, building, design <br />34 contingency and inflation consideration. When Mayor Reinert asked why the cost per <br />35 square foot rises with a smaller building, Mr. Hutson explained that is due to loss of <br />36 economy of scale and inclusion of more first time elements. <br />37 <br />38 Mayor Reinert remarked that the council must look at what the city needs. He sees that <br />39 Option C has everything that's attractive but at a huge cost — it's too high for his support. <br />40 Public Safety Director Swenson indicated that he wanted to get the information on station <br />41 options to the council so they have time to make an informed decision; he noted that there <br />42 is an important time line to be maintained in order to get a bid for the facility in January <br />43 and keep things on schedule. <br />44 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.