My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2004-051 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2004
>
2004-051 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 11:03:04 AM
Creation date
11/5/2014 10:06:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
04/26/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
04-051
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Houle/DeHaven <br />page 2 <br />for areas outside of the staged growth areas, but is specifically prohibited within staged growth <br />areas. The other Rural zone option, a one -acre lot, applies only where a habitable single family <br />home existed prior to 1992. The building permit for the existing house was issued in 1998. <br />The property was 40 acres at that time. In 2000, the City Council approved a minor subdivision <br />to split the 40 acres into the present two parcels of 15 and 25 acres. <br />Growth Management: As shown on the attached table, the City has reached its quota for <br />new lots for year 2004. Other applications listed for year 2005 all are within the staged 1 growth <br />area (pre - 2010). Several are within the existing MUSA. Creating another lot would exceed even <br />the 20% flexibility for 2004. <br />Variance <br />In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall <br />make a finding of fact: <br />a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The site is being used for a single family home. Under the current comprehensive plan, the <br />site will be eligible for development and MUSA year 2010. <br />b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the land owner. <br />The lot was created in year 2000, the result of splitting 40 acres into 15 acres and 25 acres. <br />The site is rectangular and developable in the time frame laid out by the comprehensive plan. <br />. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />It appears that economic considerations are the driving force behind the application. <br />d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />Granting this variance would be granting special privilege that is not available to others. <br />. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The Rural district purposes include the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.