Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Fox Den Acres <br />page 3 <br />The goal for 2004 has been exceeded and the additional 20% also has been used. This means <br />that additional new development cannot be final platted until 2005 and then would need the extra <br />20 %. This applies to this project. <br />As seen in the table at the end of this report, no more than 34 lots could be allowed for year 2005 <br />if other applications proceed. This is about half of the project. <br />Premature Subdivision Criteria: The subdivision ordinance is one of the City's official <br />controls designed to implement and support the policies in the comprehensive plan. Section <br />1002 -6 of the ordinance lists criteria for determining if a proposed development is premature. <br />These include consistency with the land use plan, including the staged growth area boundaries. <br />The applicant's position is that the growth area boundaries area likely were drawn to <br />approximate the developable area. There is usable upland beyond those mapped lines, and it is <br />reasonable to utilize the upland, which includes the area proposed for parkland. <br />The City currently is beginning a discussion of the comprehensive plan and the implementation <br />tools such as the growth management policy and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. With <br />the strict controls that currently are in place, it is difficult for staff to support development <br />beyond the mapped growth boundaries, particularly with the ponding and flowage easement that <br />is there and the City's desire for some greenway. These two issues are discussed further below. <br />Lots: The minimum lot size in an R -1 zone is 10,800 sf. Minimum lot width is 80', minimum <br />lot depth is 135'. All lots meet these requirements. As noted above, several lots are outside the <br />growth area and MUSA. <br />Streets, Access, Parking: Fox Road is the only access point for this site. Extending Fox Rd. <br />as proposed would exceed the maximum cul de sac length of 500' unless a future <br />outlet/connection is included. Wetland extends to the east and south for more than 1000'. There <br />is no possible additional connection on the west because the existing homes of Reshanau Lake <br />Estates South 4th Addn. (Hindsight shows that Deerwood Lane should have been designed to <br />provide a connection to the east at its southern end instead of curving west into a cul de sac. <br />This is no longer an option, however.) <br />The 500' radio tower on the north is likely to stay. The proposed road stub to the north of the <br />plat avoids the tower property. Land to the north of the stub does have on it several <br />communication facilities such as satellite dishes and the like, but nothing so imposing as the tall <br />tower. It seems possible that a road could extend to the north where pictured if these facilities <br />were removed in the future. That area includes upland, though it is impossible to know how <br />much without an actual delineation. A "ghost plat" of the area indicates there is the possibility of <br />fitting in a road and some lots. <br />The City typically does not allow islands in cul de sacs due to maintenance and plowing issues. <br />In addition, the northern road stub must accommodate a temporary cul de sac. <br />