Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />• <br />Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. <br />page 6 <br />Stormwater Management: The existing stormwater management design for the <br />area accommodates development on this site. Even so, the proposal includes some onsite <br />infiltration. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District requires District review for multi -unit development <br />over 2.5 acres. The Watershed District granted preliminary approval on June 23, though <br />the site was redesigned since then. One of the conditions of approval is that the new <br />design be reviewed by the Watershed. The developer should take note that the current <br />design must be approved by the Watershed. <br />Utilities: The project will be served with water and sanitary sewer via existing <br />facilities in Aqua Circle. The pipes in the private drives will be private utilities, owned <br />and maintained by the homeowner association. <br />Landscaping: The existing townhomes screen this site from the lake, so <br />screening is not an issue as it might be for lakeshore property. The proposed landscaping <br />is adequate, Several species were changed according to the Environmental Board's <br />recommendations, and planting locations on the new plan would not create sight line <br />issues for the Aqua Lane /Lake Drive intersection. <br />Lighting: No street or yard lighting is shown on the plans. There is no reason to <br />provide any such lighting. <br />Park Dedication: The following information was discussed at the July 14 meeting <br />and is reiterated here. The applicant has maintained that land dedicated with the larger <br />development included the dedication for most of the current four -acre site. Staff has <br />researched the file for the Marshan condominiums project. The situation is complicated <br />because there is some, but not complete overlap of the two project areas, the original <br />project was not completely built, and the ordinance requirements for park dedication have <br />changed. <br />The 1995 project included 29.9 acres. A total of 139 units were approved for the project. <br />The density then was 139/29.9 = 4.65 u/a. <br />Part of the site included an area of 1.5 acres labeled "future commercial" in which no <br />dwelling units were shown. One 5 -unit building did not get built, as it was on land not <br />ultimately platted as part of the project. Both of these areas are within the four -acre site <br />of the current proposal. <br />At the time, the subdivision ordinance included a progressive scale: the percentage of <br />land for park dedication increased as the density of a project increased. (This was <br />adopted with Ordinance 05 -91.) A density of 3 to 5 units per acre required a park <br />dedication of 12% of the land. Twelve percent of 29.9 acres is 3.6 acres. The developer <br />dedicated a 3.0 acre park and a trail corridor of 0.6 acres, for a total of 3.6 acres. <br />