My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/14/1989 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1989
>
08/14/1989 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2014 2:01:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 1:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/14/1989
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 14, 1989 <br />in the future, Sunrise Drive could be cul -de -saced near the <br />south end and this would force traffic to use Second Avenue. <br />Mr. Sargent asked why the Council could not force the <br />developers to develop larger lots? Mr. Stahlberg explained <br />that the City Code defines how large lots must be for each <br />zone. The Council has to abide by the City Code. <br />Mrs. Fenno said she agreed with Mr. Sargent and noted that <br />when they moved in the lots were platted in one acre parcels. <br />She said if the Council would listen to the residents they <br />would understand that this is the kind of town that they want <br />to live in. Nobody is against development, however larger <br />lots are wanted. Mayor Benson said that developers cannot <br />develop into one acre lots. The Metropolitan Council has <br />dictated that the lots in Lino Lakes be either ten (10) acres <br />or urban sized sewered lots. Lino Lakes can no longer be <br />developed as it was in the Ulmer's Rice Lake Estates area. <br />Mrs. Skinner said that she is frightened for the children and <br />that she moved out here for piece and quiet. She asked that <br />the Council make new developments accommodate the current <br />landowners. <br />Mr. Hawkins noted that there is a legal question as to <br />whether or not the City can make a developer pay for <br />improvements that do not directly benefit their property and <br />brings some benefit to current residents. Mayor Benson noted <br />that the Charter does not allow the Council to assess any <br />property that is not proportionally benefited. Mrs. Skinner <br />said then that if she wanted to make her road safer then she <br />would be responsible for a portion of the cost. <br />Mrs. Skinner asked why St. Joseph's Church sold their <br />property. She was told that they received an offer they <br />could not refuse. <br />Mr. Tom Smith, 874 Oak Lane noted that development is paid <br />for with City credit. He asked what would happen if a <br />development does not sell. It was explained that the City is <br />protected with a letter of credit for three years of <br />assessment payments. During that three years the City has <br />the ability to take the property and sell it and pay off the <br />bonds. Residents are protected from having to pick up any of <br />the development costs. Mr. Smith suggested that development <br />be completed in phases to allow the City to determine if <br />there will be any forfeitures. Mayor Benson also noted that <br />the City Charter does not allow the City to pay any <br />development costs (put costs on property taxes). Mr. Hawkins <br />explained that the City has taken a very conservative <br />approach to development financing. <br />Mayor Benson explained that the City is looking at the <br />overall growth of the City. This is done each year. Mr. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.