Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 26, 1990 <br />for December 20, 1990, 7:30 P.M. - Council Member Reinert moved <br />to set the public hearing. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried with Council Member Kuether abstaining. <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 79 - 90 Setting Fee for Peddler's <br />License - Mr. Miller noted that the Peddler's Ordinance was <br />enacted in February, 1989, however, to date, a fee for the <br />license has not been established. There has been an increased <br />demand for these licenses. Since there is a great deal of paper <br />work, police routine checks of "suspicious persons and <br />activities" and concern regarding cleanup a substantial license <br />fee is being suggested. Mr. Miller recommended that there be a <br />one (1) time fee of $250.00 for a six (6) month license. <br />Mayor Bisel asked if it would be possible to set various license <br />fees based upon the dollar amount of business conducted by the <br />transient merchant. He also suggested that each license merchant <br />be issued a badge. The City could charge a $50.00 license fee <br />and $200.00 for the badge. When the merchant returns the badge, <br />the $200.00 badge fee would be returned to the merchant. A badge <br />would identify the merchant to the homeowner and let the <br />homeowner know that this merchant is complying with City <br />regulations. Mr. Hawkins explained that requiring a license fee <br />based upon the amount of sales would require a report of sales. <br />This could require a considerable amount of staff time. Council <br />Member Kuether suggested that this ordinance is directed toward <br />street corner vendors, not driveway salesmen or repairmen. She <br />noted that they would require a building permit and must be <br />licensed and bonded. <br />A suggestion was made that there be a waiting period between <br />application for the license and issuing the license. Mr. Hawkins <br />said the Code could be amended to include this requirement. The <br />waiting period would allow the police department enough time to <br />check the background of the applicant. (NOTE: There is no <br />provision in the City Code requiring a police background check.) <br />Council Member Neal asked about people who advertise their cars <br />for sale on another persons property. It was noted that this is <br />not addressed in the Peddler's Code. <br />Council Member Reinert noted that solicitors for religious <br />purposes are becoming a problem. He asked that this be addressed <br />to see how it can be controlled. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to approve Resolution No. 79 - 90 <br />setting a fee of $250.00 for "Transient Merchants" licenses. <br />Council Member Neal seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, <br />motion carried unanimously. <br />PAGE 4 <br />097 <br />