Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/28/1990 Council Minutes1 COUNCIL BUDGET WORRSESSION 28 NOVEMBER 1990 Mayor Harold Bisel called the City Council Budget Work Session to order at 4:15 P.M., Wednesday 28 November 1990. Members Present: Kuether, Reinert, Bohjanen. Randy Schumacher, City Administrator, Daniel Tesch, Assistant to the City Administrator, and Paula Schloer, City Accountant were also present. Council Member Neil arrived at 4:40 P.M. Mr. Schumacher began the meeting by explaining the state's budgetary climate. The League of Minnesota Cities had held a session the day before which outlined the bleak future for municipalities in Minnesota. Fiscal disparities, new tax classes, levy limits, and a new comparable worth law are all up for review. Mayor Bisel questioned Mr. Schumacher as to whether or not our representatives in the legislature would be able to attend our meeting. Representative Quinn had phoned his regrets, Senator Dahl had not responded to our invitation. It was the concensus of the council that their strategy for the upcoming public hearing on the budget be basic, easy to understand, factual, and to create charts that the public would be able to follow. Mr. Schumacher reiterated how complicated the budget process had become, especially in the areas of revenue. Ms. Schloer pointed out that the state has had problems with their computers, and getting reliable figures on our HACA credits has been very slow. Council Member Reinert stated that the city should respond to the economy, and operate frugally and control it's internal costs. With the exception of the fire hall, which is mandated, we should tighten our belts. Mr. Schumacher stated that he and Ms. Schloer had already gone through the preliminary August budget, and had made significant cuts. He added that they have not been popular with department heads. Mr. Schumacher reported that capital outlay had been reduced from a proposed August level of $408,000.00 to $88,000.00, $27,000.00 of which is squad cars. Mayor Bisel stated that he did not want to be so frugal that we would be hit with a huge bill for equipment in a few years. We need to make smart cuts. Mr. Schumacher reported that he had already brought down the proposed levy increase from 21.8% in August to $14% in November. Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Schumacher if it would be possible add a percentage column off to the right of the worksheet which would note what percentage increase or decrease is being proposed. Mr. Schumacher responded that would be possible, and would be adjusted in time for the next meeting. Ms. Schloer handed out the August "preliminary budget" which represented the department head wish lists. The Council then PAGE 1 105 106 COUNCIL BUDGET WORRSESSION 28 NOVEMBER 1990 received the "adjusted preliminary budget" of November which showed staff cuts to date. Mr. Reinert questioned when the Council would be able to have input into the budget. Mr. Schumacher responded that the council could have as many meetings on the budget as it felt was necessary. Tomorrow night would be the public hearing in which the council would listen to public response. The council would then take the information they received from the public, as well as staff recommendations, (received by the council this evening) and based on that knowledge schedule work sessions to modify the budget as they saw fit. Mr. Schumacher presented an example to the council of how the city has affected taxes on an $85,000.00 house between the years of 1985 and 1990. The example was as follows: CITY PORTION OF TAX $85,000.00 HOME 1985 - $299.54 1986 - $307.13 1987 - $296.69 1988 - $312.36 1989 - $245.39 1990 - $240.73 1991 - $291.21 (AUGUST PRELIMINARY EST.) Mr. Schumacher explained that while taxes may have to go in 1991, taxes could possible stay below what they were in 1988. The council reviewed Mr. Schumacher's example and inquired as to the school districts portion's. Mr. Schumacher responded that he can only predict the city's portion. Mayor Bisel played devil's advocate and fielded questions to the council. Mr. Reinert again voiced his opinion that he feels left out of the budget process. Mr. Schumacher assured Mr. Reinert that he should take the budget home, study it, and would have ample time down the road to make recommendations on line items. Mr. Schumacher asked the council to consider date for their next budget work session. Mr. Reinert stated that he understood that the August budget was preliminary, but wishes he had received the August preliminary budget earlier. Mr. Schumacher stated that he would now go through the "adjusted preliminary budget" department by department. Mr. Schumacher began with Mayor and Council and proceeded through the departments explaining any significant changes in programs. Administration's only change would be the addition of a Finance Director (authorized this past year); Forestry would see the moving over of one salary from Public Works; Police would increase in salaries due to the contract. Mr. Reinert questioned why we would not see a savings due to the PAGE 2 1 07 COUNCIL BUDGET WORRSESSION 28 NOVEMBER 1990 fact that we are no longer covering Centerville. Mr. Schumacher that costs would not go down as we will still have the same equipment and number of officers. He added that service will improve for the residents of Lino Lakes. The work session was adjourned at 7:30 P.M. PAGE 3