My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/28/1991 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1991
>
01/28/1991 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2014 11:07:52 AM
Creation date
11/21/2014 1:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1991
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 28, 1991 <br />Mr. Kern asked Mr. Burke if the burden of proof should be put on <br />the Homeowners Association? Mr. Burke said that the <br />responsibility for anyone to protect themselves falls on their <br />own shoulders. You have the covenants, therefore you must bring <br />the suit. Mr. Burke explained that the City does not own the <br />land and therefore would have no legal standing. The Council has <br />an obligation to the entire City, not just to those who have <br />covenants. <br />Mayor Bisel asked Mr. Burke to explain what takes precedence if <br />there is a conflict between City Ordinances and private <br />covenants. Mr. Burke said the Ordinances take precedence. Mr. <br />Kern asked if the City issues a variance knowing that it would <br />violate private covenants, does the City assume liability if the <br />covenants are proved valid? <br />Council Member Reinert said that the problem is that two (2) <br />entities have written rights. A decision has to be made by the <br />Council as to what is good for the entire City. Eventually there <br />will be some yielding and the developer will be given the right <br />to develop in some manner. The entity with the most rights will <br />be the winner. <br />Mayor Bisel said he felt the issue of access through the Hansen <br />property should be determined before the Council acts on this <br />matter. Mr. Boxrud said that this issue will be before the DRB <br />on February 13, 1991. A determination will also be made <br />regarding how far the proposed extension of the cul -de -sac will <br />be from the Hansen home. <br />Ms. Elliot explained that some time ago Mr. Hansen was given a <br />permit to build a boat house on a piece of land providing this <br />land was combined with the land the house is on. The parcels <br />were never joined. She asked how many permits can be given on <br />one (1) parcel of land? She also asked who should enforce the <br />requirement that the parcels be joined? It was explained that <br />the matter will be back before the DRB and the City Attorney will <br />be involved at that point. <br />Council Member Reinert moved to close the public hearing at 8:40 <br />P.M. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Option No. 3 and table this <br />matter until the minor subdivision has reached the Council from <br />the DRB. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. Council <br />Member Bohjanen said that this matter cannot be concluded until <br />all Council Members are present and until the DRB has taken <br />PAGE 10 <br />226 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.