01/28/1991 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

'219 COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 28, 1991 Resolution No. 10 - 91 approving the Conditional Use Permit for Midwest Cable and Satellite, Inc. including the information in the DRB Application No. 90 - 58. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. The City Clerk read the nine conditions outlined in Resolution No. 10 - 91. Mr. Miller will send a copy of this resolution to Mr. Stromen. On a roll call vote, motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 10 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes. PUBLIC HEARING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, OAK BROOK PENINSULA Mr. Boxrud explained that this preliminary plat was before the Council previously and the Council ruled that there was not a need for an Environmental Impact Statement. The developer has proceeded with pursuing completion of acquisition of all permits from other agencies. The DRB has recommend approval of the preliminary plat, including approval of a variance for the cul- de -sac length. The conditions for approval are outlined the DRB minutes. In order for access to this plat to be completed, a minor subdivision request has been submitted by Mr. Marlin Hansen. The DRB has tabled action on this matter until the February meeting. The last permit that the applicant needed to obtain was from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The Board of Managers has recommended issuance of the permit provided drainage from the plat is all directed to the south, even if it means construction of diversion berms, so that runoff from the developed home sites did not reach the bog lying north of the plat. They also required that septic tank regulations be enforced by the City. The final condition was that there be no filling allowed in the channel. The final plans are to be reviewed by the RCWD engineer prior to construction. Mr. Boxrud explained that the RCWD engineer has determined that the proposed road crossing is 45 feet wide. Another location to the south is approximately 19.5 feet wide. If the street is reasonably realigned to the 19.5 foot wide location, a large culvert could be constructed which would not put an undue maintenance responsibility on the City. However, if the culvert gets to be 20 feet or larger, the culvert would be classified as a bridge and would require annual inspections. The Public Works Department prefers that the crossing be limited to less than 20 feet in width so as to avoid the possible large reconstruction cost and annual inspection fees. Mr. Adamson, developer of this plat has submitted a brief work PAGE 3