My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/29/1991 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1991
>
08/29/1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 1:43:28 PM
Creation date
11/25/2014 1:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/29/1991
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
63 <br />BUDGET WORK SESSION <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />AUGUST 29, 1991 <br />DATE August 29, 1991 <br />TIME STARTED 8:43 A.M. <br />TIME ENDED • 9:50 A.M. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Bisel, Bohjanen, Kuether, Neal, Reinert <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br />Staff Members present: City Administrator, Randy Schumacher; <br />Accountant, Paula Schloer and Clerk - Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. <br />CONSIDERATION OF THE 1992 PRELIMINARY LEVY <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that the Council set December 5, 1991 as <br />the public hearing date for the 1992 Budget. After consulting <br />calendars, the Council agreed to set December 12, 1991 as a <br />backup date in the event the public hearing is continued. <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that the Council must adopt a <br />preliminary levy before September 3, 1991. The State of <br />Minnesota has determined that the levy for Lino Lakes for 1992 <br />will be $1,557,076.00. The City cannot levy above this figure. <br />However, the City can levy less. Even though the population of <br />Lino Lakes is growing each year, with the reduction of state <br />aids, this means that the City will actually be receiving <br />$4,000.00 less in 1992 in than in 1991. The questions is, if the <br />municipal population is growing, why should the City get less <br />aid? The money is not being re- routed to the school districts as <br />was first thought. Council Member Reinert noted that the <br />legislature is forcing municipalities to go deeper in debt which <br />will create deteriorating cities because services and maintenance <br />will be reduced. Mayor Bisel asked what the state was doing with <br />the money. He noted that the state should be suffering along <br />with the local municipalities. <br />There was further discussion regarding the states attempt to <br />"dip" into reserves of municipalities. It was noted that <br />apparently legislators do not understand the ramification of the <br />legislation that they pass each year. <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that three (3) areas of the budget must <br />be particularly addressed by the Council. These areas are <br />PAGE 1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.