My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/02/1991 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1991
>
10/02/1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 10:03:45 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 9:06:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/02/1991
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
125 <br />COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 2, 1991 <br />DATE October 2, 1991 <br />TIME STARTED 3:40 P.M. <br />TIME ENDED 4:30 P.M. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Bisel, Bohjanen, Kuether, Neal, Reinert <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br />Staff members present: Accountant, Paula Schloef'; Administrator, <br />Randy Schumacher and Clerk- Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. <br />CENTERVILLE CONSOLIDATION COMMITTEE <br />Mr. Schumacher handed out information to the Council regarding <br />the attempt by some Centerville citizens to consolidate <br />Centerville with Lino Lakes. The information included consists <br />of a letter from the State of Minnesota Municipal Board <br />requesting that the Lino Lakes and Centerville City Council's <br />each prepare a list of ten candidates to serve on the <br />consolidation commission. The Municipal Board will select five <br />(5) candidates from each City to act as the consolidation <br />commission. In addition a separate list of three (3) candidates <br />was requested. The Municipal Board will select a consolidation <br />commission chair from this second list. Mr. Schumacher noted <br />that these two (2) lists of candidates were requested by October <br />24, 1991. The consolidation commission is expected to consider <br />all of the pros and cons regarding consolidation and prepare a <br />report to the Municipal Board. This process could be lengthy and <br />may require a great amount of time on the part of the members. <br />The information given to the Council included the function of the <br />commission and the subjects that they must consider. <br />Council Member Kuether suggested that if either Council was <br />opposed to the Consolidation, they could select 10 candidates <br />against consolidation and subvert the process. Mr. Schumacher <br />said the commission should determine at the beginning if this is <br />the case, and do their best to reduce the time involved. <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that both City Council's must a adopt a <br />resolution agreeing to consolidate. If any one (1) Council does <br />not pass such a resolution, the matter goes to a referendum in <br />both Cities. <br />PAGE 1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.