Laserfiche WebLink
155 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 28, 1991 <br />that this lawsuit appears to be nearing a settlement. He will <br />bring the results of the negotiation back to the City Council for <br />their review and approval. <br />The Council took a five (5) minute recess at 8:20 P.M. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Charter Commission Appointments - Mr. Hawkins explained that <br />questions regarding the appointment process to this commission <br />have been raised. He noted that there were nine (9) vacancies. <br />One (1) appointment is needed to complete the remaining two (2) <br />years of a term and eight (8) appointments are needed to fill the <br />terms that expired August 31, 1991. Mr. Hawkins read the State <br />Statute regarding the appointment process. He also noted that <br />the City received a copy of a letter written by the Charter <br />Commission Chairman, Jeanne Goldade to Judge Gibbs listing nine <br />(9) names that she had recommended to Judge Gibbs to fill the <br />vacancies. Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Schumacher felt this matter <br />should be brought to the attention of the City Council and this <br />was done on August 26, 1991. The Council instructed Mr. <br />Schumacher to write to the Judge and ask for an extension of time <br />to allow the City to advertise the Charter Commission vacancies <br />and to prepare a list of recommended appointments. The Council <br />met on September 9, 1991 and voted on a list of nine (9) <br />nominations for the vacant positions. The list was transmitted <br />to Judge Gibbs by Mr. Hawkins. Judge Gibbs appointed the list <br />submitted by the City Council because the Charter Commission had <br />not met to officially recommended a list of appointments. <br />According to State Statute 410.05, Subd. 3. Commission <br />appointment; nominees, Judge Gibbs appointed from the only list <br />meeting State Statute requirements. Mr. Hawkins explained that <br />the State Statutes do not provide for private citizens to <br />recommend Charter Commission appointments. Mr. Hawkins also <br />noted that the Charter Commission could not make a recommendation <br />without meeting and complying with the open meeting law. <br />Council Member Reinert was concerned because Mr. Hawkins appeared <br />to be speaking for the City Council in his letter to Judge Gibbs <br />dated September 13, 1991. He also did not agree that the <br />Chairman of the Charter Commission could not submit names to <br />Judge Gibbs for the Charter Commission. He said he felt that <br />citizens should be able to have their names submitted to the <br />Judge by any organization. Council Member Reinert said he felt <br />Mr. Hawkins letter said, "disregard the Charter Commission <br />Chairman's letter and use only the City Council's list of <br />nominees ". Mr. Hawkins explained that the Council had voted <br />unanimously to submit their own list. He had no problem with the <br />Charter Commission Chairman submitting her own list. Council <br />Member Reinert said it appeared to him that the City Attorney was <br />PAGE 13 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />