12/19/1991 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 19, 1991 Council Member Bohjanen moved to approve a minor subdivision as outlined in DRB application No. 91 -54 contingent upon vacation of the 66 foot road easement. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Council Member Reinert said that he did not receive a copy of the Certificate of Survey and asked if the vacation of the road easement is tied into future development. Mr. Miller explained that the easement was not for potential development but for the use of the property owner on the south to get to the parcel behind his homestead. This property owner has another access to his property and the easement is not needed. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel ® Bohjanen Neal ❑ Reinert El Abstained: Neal, Kuether Motion failed. Kuether ❑ Council Member Reinert moved to return this item to the DRB and request that a ghost plat and certificate of survey be required. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Bohjanen voting no and Council Member Kuether abstaining. Set Public Hearing for Vacation of a Street and Road Easement for Land Located in the NW 1/4 of Section 4 for January 13, 1992 at 7:15 P.M. - This matter was tabled pending action on the minor subdivision request. Set Public Hearing for a Rezone of Land Described as Outlot A of Nordin Manor from General Business to S -R, Suburban Residential for January 13, 1992 - Council Member Bohjanen moved to set this public hearing. Council Member Reinert seconded he motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration and Approval of Request for Variance Submitted by Bob Moser, DRB Application No. 91 - 46 - Mr. Miller explained that R. J. Moser Builders, Inc. constructed a residence at 6457 Fawn Lane. A survey completed in March, 1991 indicates that the house did not meet the required five (5) foot setback but is about seven (7) inches too close to the property line. The property owners are concerned that this error may "cloud" the title to the property or in some way make the future sale difficult. The applicant is asking for an after - the -fact variance permitting construction of the house to within 4.3 feet of the side lot line. This would be on the garage side of the house. PAGE 9 242