My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/25/1974 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1974
>
11/25/1974 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 1:05:41 PM
Creation date
11/26/2014 12:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/1974
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />November 25, 1974 <br />Mr. Jaworski requested the use of the Hall by the Happy Hustlers 4H Group <br />on December 13, 1974 at 7:30 P.M. to hold their annual Christmas Party. Mr. <br />Jaworski moved to approve the request providing they are responsible for <br />cleaning the Hall after the party. Seconded by Mr. Marier. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Marier questioned the work order for West Shadow Lake Drive. He felt that <br />the amount of gravel in tons and /or costs should be on the order, not just <br />so many loads of no stated weight. The work order should be more explicit <br />and a copy of the resolution authorizing this action should be attached. <br />Mr. Jaworski explained that this work is paid for by Mr. Jandric, but he will <br />follow suggestions on the next work order. <br />Mr. McLean reported that the Park Board meeting had been rescheduled for <br />December 2, 1974 due to conflicts of other meetings. He recommended that the <br />letter from Mr. Trombley, of the Lino Lakes Athletic Association be referred <br />to the Park Board. Mr. Trombley will be invited to attend the December 2, <br />1974 meeting in order to clarify some of the points raised in the letter. <br />Mr. Volk will also attend that meeting to answer questions.' <br />Mr. Marier was under the impression that this association was to submit to <br />the Park Board a program for use by the Park Board in setting the 1975 <br />budget. Mr. McLean said that he had not seen such a schedule. <br />Mr. Zelinka reported that there had not been a meeting of the Personnel <br />Commission. He had no other matters to report on. He proceeded -to the Mayor's <br />report. <br />A letter had been received from P. M. Endsley Company offering to review <br />the insurance program of the Ciyt. The Clerk was instructed to return the card. <br />Mr- Zelinka remarked that in the future, a date for delivery should be noted <br />on the requisitions. <br />8 3 <br />Mr. Dan Erwin of the Crimsoncross Kennels was in the audience to explain their <br />problems with the handling of horses. The Kennel does not have the facilities <br />to transport the animals, so in the future they will tie the animal and the removal <br />will have to be handled by the City. He has two numbers of persons who will trans- <br />port the animals. He suggested giving these numbers to the Police Department and they <br />can handle it. <br />Mr. Zelinka asked if there were facilities for boarding horses at the Kennel <br />and Mr. Erwin, said No. <br />Mr. Marier suggested that Mr.Erwin give the two numbers to the Police and the Clerk. <br />The Clerk is to contact the persons for charges for this service. <br />Mr. Locher apologized for not having an attorney at the last Council meeting. There were <br />two men and each thought the other was to attend. <br />Mr. Locher discussed the ruling on the Circle Pines Utility law suit in connection with <br />the Molin case. The supreme Court had ruled that Circle Pines cannot extend their <br />lines without the express permission of the Lino Lakes City Council but the Court <br />had denied the request to enjoin Circle Pines from charging the Court cost to the <br />Lino Lakes portion of the system. The reason being the Court felt that this- would be <br />rate setting. The charges of $1,200.00 for preparation of the brief was denied. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.