Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM 7 B <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: April 28, 2003 <br />TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING <br />Resolution 03 -44: Negative Declaration On The <br />Need For An Environmental Impact Statement <br />Eagle Brook Church <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared for the Eagle Brook Church <br />has undergone public review. The City received comments and staff distributed a draft <br />response document on March 19. The next step is for the City Council to make a <br />declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). For reasons <br />discussed in the response document and summarized in this report, staff is recommending <br />a negative declaration: a decision that an EIS is not justified. <br />The responses in the response document should be revised or corrected as necessary <br />before distribution. Several corrections are listed in Attachment A. Additional revisions <br />may be warranted after the public hearing. The decision resolution and the final response <br />document will be sent to all agencies on the EAW distribution list and to everyone who <br />sent in comments on the EAW. <br />The City Council discussed the resolution at the work session on April 9 and decided to <br />hold a public hearing. Resolution 03 -44 was pulled from the April 14 agenda to allow for <br />the public hearing on April 28. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The main issues raised by the EAW or in comments on the EAW relate to the following: <br />heron rookery wetlands <br />traffic and roadways wastewater <br />stormwater management visual issues <br />Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, Subpart 7 lists the criteria to be considered to determine if a <br />project has the potential for significant environmental effects —that is, if an EIS is <br />warranted. <br />