My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2003-061 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2003
>
2003-061 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2014 2:13:17 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 11:51:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
06/09/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
03-061
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 14, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br />Chair Schaps asked if the existing garage was 26 feet deep. Ms. Keller replied it was 20 <br />feet, with six feet of entryway. <br />Chair Schaps asked how many feet wide the garage would be if they stayed within the <br />ordinance. Ms. Keller replied the original plan they had was a three -car garage with three <br />stalls out in front, but now they decided to do a double -deep garage in back, which would <br />add six additional feet. <br />Chair Schaps asked if they had considered any other way to do this. Ms. Keller replied <br />they were making the decision knowing what the possibility of the road was in the future. <br />She stated they would be responsible for making this choice. She pointed out there were <br />many homes in the City with a 30 -foot setback. She noted there were no plans at this <br />time to even expand the road. She indicated if they had the entrance to the garage in the <br />back of their property, they would have to remove trees and the driveway would cut right <br />through their yard. She noted they also had to upgrade their septic system, which would <br />also limit their garage expansion. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if they were only going to have two doors facing the front. Ms. Keller <br />replied that was correct. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he believed they could make their plan work without having to need <br />this variance. Ms. Keller stated 20 feet for a garage was not workable and they were <br />banging their doors on the side of the garage when they opened them. <br />Mx. Lyden stated he did not believe the road would ever go through and the reason the <br />Zoning Ordinance existed was to protect the public, and in this case the only one affected <br />was the homeowner. He stated he saw no reason how by expanding the garage six feet to <br />the south it would irnpact the public good. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if the road was proposed when they bought the home. Ms. Keller <br />replied she was informed the road might be expanded when they bought the home in <br />1986 and it was on a ten year plan. <br />Mr. Tralle stated he agreed with Mr. Lyden and he could not see the road going through <br />any time soon. He noted they could plan things and say they were going to do them, but <br />if it was obvious it was not going to happen, they had to realize that. <br />Mr. Hyden asked if this was at one time a 30 -foot setback. Ms. Gretz replied she was <br />able to obtain that back to 1992, collector streets required a 40 -foot setback and before <br />that the Ordinance quoted a 30 -foot setback from the street, not differentiating if it was a <br />collector street. <br />Mr. Hyden asked what were they suppose to go by. Ms. Gretz replied they dealt with <br />what they had now and hoped it was the best way to go. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated the most positive thing was that the people who built the home knew <br />the street might go through and everyone was made aware of the fact that the street might <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.