Laserfiche WebLink
114 <br />May 22, 1978 <br />Mayor Karth said if there is a motion to deny this amendment, and <br />the WPC -40 rules are not passed, and this amendment is to be re- <br />considered, then the entire process of publication and public <br />hearing must be repeated. <br />Mr. McLean moved, that since the WPC -40 Rules and Regulations will <br />supersede any Ordinance of this City, and since these Rules are to <br />be passed within a month, this Amendment to Ordinance #53B be de- <br />nied. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszwicz. Motion declared passed. <br />Mr. Rehbein felt that there should be some discussion on the actions <br />of the Metro Council and their attempts to police the actions of <br />this City. He cited the requirement of a perc test. He felt that <br />almost any portion of this City could pass a perc test if it is done <br />by the right man. <br />Mr. Rehbein was told that the perc test requirement is a part of the <br />State Building Code and not a matter relating to Metro. <br />Mr. Rehbein also objected to the collection of the SAC, he felt that <br />assessing this to areas that would probably never get sewers was un- <br />fair. <br />The Council felt that the time to have objected to many of the rules <br />imposed on this City was in 1975 at the time the Land Planning Act <br />was passed by the State Legislature. This City passed a Resolution <br />objecting to this Act and ti the powers of the Metro Council and <br />sent this Resolution to every community in the seven County Metro <br />area, to all State and Federal Senators and Representatives, Metro <br />Council members, and the Governor. Of all the copies sent out, only <br />18 bothered to answer. <br />Mr. Mobley said there was a program on the 60 Minutes show on the <br />subject of Metro Government and in three major Cities this has been <br />proven to be unconstitutional. <br />Mayor Karth said the local government is not the place to go to ob- <br />ject to Metro powers. Residents should contact their State Repre- <br />sentatives and State Senators. <br />Mr. Jim Kellog said the Metro is an illegal function fo government <br />and felt the bill authorizing the establishment of this unit was un- <br />constitutional- he asked why Cities continued to fill out their forms. <br />Mayro Karth said until proven illegal by Court action, this is <br />backed by the State Legislature and Cities must abide by State Law. <br />Mr. Locher said the legality of the Metro could be attacked but the <br />legal fees would probably be around $20,000.00 and no one community <br />has that kind of funds for this action. Furthermore, if the Cities <br />do mot conform, all funds are withheld - such as FHA mortage funds, <br />sewer funds. Federal Highway funds - all these funds must be filtered <br />through Metro. <br />Mr. Bill Houle noted that Mr. Howard Neison, State Representatives <br />for this area, was present. He asked what he had done in the area <br />of reducing the powers of the Metro Council. <br />