Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />4� <br />August 7, 1979 v J <br />the properties covered by the special use permit situation. He also felt <br />that the maps, developments and records addressed in the discussion of the <br />area probably did not reflect all the materisl handled during those years, <br />and there was so much variation in these that the Council should address <br />the issue from the standpoint of what should be done now in terms of the <br />total area -- what should be done with it and what it should look like <br />and so forth. This also should be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. <br />looking at the whole picture rather than handling it piecemeal. Mr. Zelinka <br />out that these properties should be handled with ethical fairmess, and <br />that, for example, Feedrite had no idea that they had to start construction <br />within a few nonths and complete it within 3 years, or the property would <br />revert to its original zoning. He felt they should definately be notified <br />and that there would be a lot of hardshop as a result. He pointed out <br />that if the developer - homeowner situation could be resolved amicably. <br />the City could have some time to reword the ordinances to reflect what <br />they intended to say, and also so that they are relatively easily understood. <br />Mr. DeNuccio had some further questions on the special use permits and <br />how they were used now; Mayor Karth indicated that they had been appropriate <br />at the time under Ordinance No. 6, although a rezone would be used for <br />the function today. Mr. Benson felt that the motion by restated and that <br />issue decided before the homeowners and developer tried to resolve the <br />issue; Mayor Karth indicated more consideration and input was necessary <br />before that issue could be acted upon by the Council in view of the <br />properties ffected. Mr. Schneider added that it was necessary to determine <br />to whom did it apply and the interpretation to be given it. A homeowner <br />in the audience, speaking for himself, said that he had bought his pro- <br />perty with the understanding that the area was zoned for single family <br />residences. and that as a neighborhood they would welcome further single <br />family development, that is, a development consistant with the already <br />existing neighborhood. He felt that nothing further should be done with <br />the land until the long range Comprehensive Plan for the area was com- <br />pleted; and that a thoughtful, planned development of the community was <br />necessary. The quads would have a deninate impact on the lifestyle of <br />the residents. <br />Mr. Schneider moved to set a special Council meeting for Wednesday, Aug. <br />22, 1979 at 8:00 P.M. for the disposition of the question of the special <br />use permits. Mr. McLean seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion <br />declared passed. The Council should be ready at that time to make a <br />motion on the issue and pass it. <br />Mr. Blackbird was asked if he had a presentation ready, but replied that <br />aside from the geustion of the special use permits he had been advised <br />not to speak, and had no presentation to make. He felt the special use <br />permits still applied to thearea, and the seller of the single family <br />homes had been at fault. Mr. DeNuccio raised a question of how a buyer <br />would become aware of the zoning in an area. There was some further <br />discussion on this, and Mr. Locher said that at that time the St. Paul <br />Poineer Press had mentioned townhouses along with aswimming pool, etc. <br />Mr. Zelinka said that apparently the buyers had been either deliberately, <br />accidently, or through misunderstanding been misled becasue they were of <br />the opinion that this areas was dedicated to single family residences, <br />and yet as the records showed, the last offical action was of the opinion <br />that it was dedicated by special use permit to miltifamily dwellings=. <br />Dave Cody, resident, indicated that according to the Ordinance it would <br />no longer have neen multifamily dwellings. However, it was felt this was <br />open to interpretation. There was further discussion initiated by Mr. <br />DeNuccio on where zoning records appear; this was clarified. <br />