Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 1991 <br />Council will then close the public hearing. Normally there is a <br />60 day waiting period before the Council can order the <br />improvement. However, the only landowner has petitioned for 50 <br />of the 60 day waiting period to be waived. This matter will be <br />brought back to the Council at the next regular meeting with a <br />resolution ordering the improvement. Bids for the improvement <br />can be ordered and could be awarded as early as the first meeting <br />in June. <br />Mr. Schneider noted that there are other possible sewer and water <br />connections along the sewer and water route outside of the Wenzel <br />subdivision. He explained that any landowner interested in <br />connecting to the utilities can petition for the improvement. <br />Mayor Bisel opened the public hearing at 7:31 P.M. Tom Mesich, <br />7064 Rice Lake Lane noted that a petition was started in his <br />neighborhood for installation of sewer and water. This caused <br />one of his neighbors to move and another to seriously think about <br />moving. He said he and many of his neighbors were against <br />splitting his back yard to gain additional lots. However, they <br />never took the time to complain. He said it was nice of them to <br />put the sewer next to his house and said he would like to know <br />the cost to him. <br />Mayor Bisel said that no landowner on Rice Lake Lane will be <br />forced to split their lots or hook up to the sewer and water. <br />However, he noted that this has been done in several other areas <br />of Lino Lakes. <br />There was no one else to speak at this public hearing. Council <br />Member Bohjanen moved to close the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. <br />Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried with <br />Council Member Kuether abstaining. <br />PLANNER'S REPORT <br />Consideration of Amendment of PineRidge PUD - Mr. Miller <br />explained that PineRidge is currently zoned Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) and an agreement was completed with the <br />developer regarding conditions attached to the development of <br />this property. At this time the developer is requesting that his <br />agreement be amended to allow 30 of the 68 lots to be permitted <br />to be constructed to modified R -1 standards instead of the <br />required R -1X standards. Mr. Miller explained the lots would be <br />enhanced R -1 lots and would require that seven (7) provisions to <br />ensure curb appeal be followed. The seven (7) provisions are <br />outlined in Mr. Miller's "green sheet" dated April 3, 1991. The <br />developer has agreed to all seven (7) of the provisions. <br />Mr. Miller noted that he met with Mr. Carlson, developer of <br />PAGE 5 <br />075 <br />