Laserfiche WebLink
078. <br />COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 1991 <br />the final plat of Reshanau Park, Second Addition contingent upon <br />completion of the developer's agreement and payment of all <br />outstanding escrow accounts. Council Member Neal seconded the <br />motion. On a roll call vote, motion called unanimously. <br />Minor Subdivision, Marlin Hanson - Mr. Miller explained that Mr. <br />Hanson had three (3) parcels of land that he has combined into <br />one (1) parcel containing approximately 14 acres. Mr. Hanson has <br />now requested that this one (1) parcel be divided into three (3) <br />parcels as follows: 1) a 2.5 acre parcel that would include his <br />homestead, 2) a parcel that provides the roadway providing access <br />for Oak Brook Peninsula, and 3) a parcel about 11 acres for the <br />purpose of building another house. It was noted that in 1985 Mr. <br />Hanson was granted a permit to construct a boat house with the <br />stipulation that the parcel with the boat house be combined with <br />the homestead. Mr. Hanson had not completed the combination of <br />the parcels until recently and explained why this was not done. <br />Mr. Miller explained that Mr. Hanson had also requested a <br />variance because it was thought that Mr. Hanson would be creating <br />an undersized lot for his homestead. According to the 1985 <br />zoning ordinance, Mr. Hanson will be creating a legal sized lot <br />and the variance is not needed. <br />Council Member Reinert was concerned because the Council would be <br />creating the roadway to Oak Brook Peninsula before the <br />subdivision was approved. He asked what would happen to this <br />parcel if Oak Brook Peninsula was not approved. Mr. Miller <br />explained he was concerned that the Council would not consider <br />the preliminary plat for Oak Brook Peninsula because there was no <br />roadway approaching the subdivision. He suggested that the <br />Council consider a two (2) lot subdivision as follows: 1) a 2.5 <br />acre parcel containing the homestead, and 2) a parcel containing <br />approximately 11.5 acres. This parcel can be later subdivided if <br />the Oak Brook Peninsula subdivision is approved. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to deny the variance, DRB <br />Application No. 90 - 65. Council Member Neal seconded the <br />motion. On a roll call vote, motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Frank Kern approached the Council to say that Mr. Hanson was <br />not telling the truth regarding why he did not combine his <br />parcels in 1985 as the Council had requested. Mayor Bisel <br />explained that Mr. Kern's comments were of a personal nature and <br />that he would not allow them-to be part of the record. <br />Council Member Reinert moved to approve the first parcel of 2.5 <br />acres of land containing Mr. Hanson's homestead and the second <br />parcel of approximately 11.5 acres containing the remainder of <br />the property. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. On a <br />PAGE 8 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />