Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />Neal © Reinert <br />Abstained: none, Council Member Kuether was absent. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />JUNE 24, 1991 <br />Council Member Bohjanen moved to approve DRB application No. 91- <br />18 granting a variance for the long cul -de -sac and for Lots 1, 2, <br />3, 4 and 5, Block 3, Reshanau Lake Estates South, 4th Addition. <br />Council Member Neal seconded the motion. <br />VOTING ON THE MOTION: <br />Bisel © Bohjanen <br />Neal © Reinert <br />Abstained: none, Council Member Kuether was absent. <br />Kuether ❑ <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />The six (6) findings of fact to support the above variance are as <br />follows: <br />1. As a result of identification of protected wetlands on the <br />property, the land could not be put to reasonable use under <br />conditions allowed by official controls. <br />2. The plight of the land is caused by approval of adjacent <br />subdivisions in the area and the existence of certain <br />wetlands both on and adjacent to the site. <br />3. No reasonable use other than single- family development <br />exists for the property; the land is within the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area boundary. <br />4. No special privilege is granted to the applicant as <br />variances in similar situations have been granted to other <br />landowners. <br />5. The single - family development will be consistent with <br />adjacent neighborhoods. <br />6. The landowner submitted an application in accordance with <br />the requirements of this ordinance and proper procedure was <br />followed in its consideration. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, VACATION OF EASEMENTS, WOODRIDGE ESTATES, <br />RESOLUTION NO. 60 - 91 <br />Mr. Schneider explained that there is a 20 foot easement on the <br />south property line of Lot 1, Block 3, Woodridge Estates. This <br />PAGE 12 <br />235 <br />