05/08/1995 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 Ordinance No. 07 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 07 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 08 - 95, Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for Lino Air Park Lots - Ms. Wyland explained that the City Council approved the FIRST READING of this ordinance at their April 24, 1995 meeting. The ordinance places a PDO onto a portion of the Lino Air Park North plat that is being incorporated into the Behm's Century Farms development. The PDO will contain all provisions approved in review of the preliminary plat. Council Member Bergeson asked if this action makes these lots essentially the same as the existing Air Park lots. Ms. Wyland explained that the lots in Behm's Century Farms will be smaller and the PDO will place more restrictive conditions on them. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 08 - 95 and dispense with the reading, rezoning the Behm's Century Farms Air Park lots to R -1 with a PDO. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 08 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, JOHN POWELL Consideration of a Petition Requesting an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Trapper's Crossing - Mr. Powell explained that the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) received a petition requesting that an EAW be prepared for the Trapper's Crossing subdivision. The petition was forwarded to the City of Lino Lakes on March 29, 1995 for the City to decide on the need for an EAW. The petition was referred to SEH, the consultant assigned to this project, to make a recommendation regarding the petition. SEH has determined that preparation of an EAW for this project is not mandatory. As the project is also not specifically exempted, the City must decide in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Part 4410.1100, Subpart 6, whether or not an EAW is to be prepared. Based on the SEH review of the petition it appears that the petition fails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, preparation of an EAW is not required. Regardless of the City Council's action on this matter, the concerns noted by the nearby residents at the May 3, 1995 City Council work session will be forwarded to the developer for consideration during final design of the improvements. The PAGE 8