My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/22/1995 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1995
>
05/22/1995 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2014 2:02:16 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 12:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
05/22/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEETING <br />MAY 22, 1995 <br />street and not the driveways or the parking areas. Mr. Derrick <br />said that deleting the curbing would not be setting a precedent <br />since this is a private street. He noted that are no driveways <br />in the City that are curbed and felt there should not be curbs on <br />these private driveways. <br />Mr. Brixius said that the City Engineer has prepared a report <br />dated May 5, 1995. He asked that any recommendation in that <br />report be included in a Council motion. Mr. Brixius said that <br />curbing is a City zoning standard and has been applied throughout <br />the community in both the residential, commercial /industrial and <br />multifamily developments. The driveways leading up to the <br />garages would not necessarily need curbing, however all private <br />streets and parking areas should meet this standard. The PDO <br />flexibility that has been noted as far as parking and private <br />drives can be related directly to occupancy. The curbing is a <br />budgetary item and is something that staff deals with each time a <br />developer says that he never planned to pay for it. Mr. Brixius <br />said that staff is holding the line on this item. He noted that <br />it was recommended for the 1992 proposal and again is recommended <br />in 1995. <br />Mayor Reinert said he did not understand the concern about <br />placing curbing along driveways. He noted that Mr. Brixius did <br />not require curbing on driveways. Mr. Brixius explained that Mr. <br />Derrick was objecting to placing curbing on the private access <br />streets serving more than one driveway. Mr. Brixius pointed out <br />these areas on the overhead projector. <br />Mr. Derrick said this situation is different because this <br />development has single family residential development character <br />and not a commercial development character. Mayor Reinert said <br />that he felt that curbing adds to the appearance of a development <br />and would help make the development easier to sell in 15 years. <br />Mr. Derrick said he felt that whether or not there is curbing, <br />the development will look the same in 15 years as it is built. <br />It will be professionally maintained and will be beautiful in 15 <br />years. <br />Mr. Brixius noted that the Planning and Zoning Board also <br />discussed the potential re -use of the various garage spaces. A <br />recommendation was made that if a tenant does not have a car, but <br />has a garage, they may have some latitude in renting the garage <br />but it is limited to another tenant who lives in the same <br />development. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked if the Planning and Zoning Board <br />made any recommendation on use after 15 years. Mr. Brixius <br />stated that it will remain a senior housing for the next 30 <br />PAGE 14 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.