My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-002 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-002 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2014 3:00:55 PM
Creation date
12/12/2014 1:16:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
02/12/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
01-002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Council Member Dahl introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION No. 2001 -02 <br />RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR CHRIS LYDEN RESIDENCE <br />AT <br />6275 Holly Drive, Lino Lakes, MN. <br />WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City Council for a Variance from <br />the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Code at 6275 Holly Drive, and <br />WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: <br />insert legal <br />WHEREAS, Section 3, Subd. 4.D.8.d.5) of the City Zoning Ordinance prohibits <br />accessory buildings with metal corrugated siding or roof, except upon tool sheds less than <br />four hundred (400) square feet in area, and <br />Whereas, the same section of the Zoning Ordinance does not allow pole buildings, <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant desires to build a pole building with metal corrugated <br />siding and roof, and <br />WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance provides that in considering all requests for <br />variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a find of fact: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br />his property not created by the land owner. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, <br />or buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.