Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8,2001 <br />PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA <br />There was no Public Safety Department report. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT;. <br />Resolution No. 01— 02, Variance Request by Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Driye, J ;�ff Smyser (3/5 <br />Vote Required) — Staff presented the application by explaining Chris Lyden owns4.07 acres of <br />Vo q ) P <br />property, zoned rural, at 6275 Holly Drive. Since the ordinance requires a minimum of ten acres in <br />the rural zoning district, this property is a pre- existing non - conforming lot of record. Mr. Lyden <br />would like to construct a 34 -foot by 64 -foot pole barn on the property using metal siding and roofing <br />material. The Zoning Ordinance specifically prohibits metal siding and roofing material on properties <br />less that five (5) acres in size. The proposed construction will meet the square footage requirement <br />and setback requirements. <br />Staff reviewed the findings of fact that need to be met for variance consideration and indicated staff <br />does not believe this variance criteria can be met in this case since Mr. Lyden can construct a wood <br />frame building, on footings without a slab, that would have a similar effect to a post frame building, <br />although it would be more costly. Staff advised it has received numerous requests for such <br />construction and always discouraged the variance procedure because in most cases, the requests were <br />based on the additional construction costs. <br />11 Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the applicant has described his hardship as follows: <br />1. Pole barn type construction is preferable for this property due to questionable soils. <br />2. Pole barn type construction, without a cement floor, is necessary to preserve 1958 mid- <br />engine all wood day cruiser due to moisture factors. <br />3. Pole barn type construction will reduce threat of loss from grass fires. <br />Staff noted the adjoining property owners have indicated no objections to the variance request. <br />Mayor Bergeson inquired about the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board. <br />Staff advised the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their December 2000 meeting. <br />Mr. Rafferty made a motion to approve the variance and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion failed <br />with 3 ayes, 3 nays, and 1 abstain. <br />Council Member Carlson referred to the Findings of Fact. She inquired about how the City should <br />handle the Findings of Fact that are not met on the resolution itself. The City Attorney advised the <br />Findings of Fact that are not met should be noted on the resolution. <br />