My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-055 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-055 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 6:51:49 PM
Creation date
12/15/2014 2:10:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
04/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
01-055
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
01-55 <br /> • Council Member Reinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. <br /> CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 01-55 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR <br /> 6641 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE <br /> WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City Council for a Variance from the City of <br /> Lino Lakes Zoning Code, and <br /> WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: <br /> Lot 28, Block 4, Lakes Addition No. 2 <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, Section 6, Subd. 1.B.4.d. of the City Zoning Ordinance requires a side yard setback <br /> of ten (10) feet for the principal building and five (5) feet for an accessory building, and <br /> WHEREAS, an attached garage is required to meet the accessory building setback but living <br /> space is required to meet the principal building setback, and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant desires to construct an addition to the existing structure that would <br /> include garage space on the main level and living space on the second story, and <br /> WHEREAS the existing structure is less than ten (10) feet from the side property line, and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes makes following findings of fact: <br /> 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br /> allowed by the official controls. The existing house is small by current standards and <br /> does not meet the reasonable needs of contemporary families. <br /> 2. The plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property <br /> not created by the landowner. The existing structure is less than the setback required <br /> for living space, and it is reasonable to utilize existing building walls to plan <br /> additional space. <br /> 3. The hardship is not due to economic considerations alone. This application is not <br /> driven by reluctance to spend extra money to avoid the need for a variance. <br /> 4. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br /> that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the <br /> same district. The house on this property is built at an angle to the side lot line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.