Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />JI <br />10 -19 -72 <br />Mr. Marier explained his position. The P &Z worked with what they had. There are five <br />recommendations from the Planner and three from the Engineer. <br />Mr. Bohjanen asked Mr. Busch about the five recommendations from the P &Z, Mr. Busch <br />replied that #1 - the company is agreeable to all R 1 zoning; #2 & #3 - if the Council <br />approved these recommendations, then this is fine with U. S. Lakes; #4 - they agree to the <br />revision of East Shadow Lake Drive; #5 - This is agreeable also. <br />Mrs. Borovansky asked if they take out the buffer zone then what will be done with this <br />land = will there be more homes in the area - just how will this land be used? Mr. Busch <br />tried to explain but Mr. Marier interrupted and said that he had given f'ris recommendations <br />and felt that Mr. Busch was out of order. Mr. Busch said these are only plans and deal only <br />with the mechanics of the plat, not the basic platting. Mr. Marier said these things should <br />be dealt with by the Planner and Engineer and felt that the floor should be opened for <br />questions. <br />Mrs. Borovansky said she felt that her question had not been answered. Is this the only <br />plan that they can look at - isnt there a counter proposal? How many other homes will be <br />put in this buffer zone? <br />Mr. Busch explain -d that these plans are not the Company's but are from the P8Z. The <br />Company would prefer to leave the park area of about 13 acres of land. If this is removed <br />from the buffer zone then the streets wi I I be redesigned and there will be about 18 more <br />lots. <br />Mr. Zelinka asked why the P &Z eliminated the green area? What was their thinking on this? <br />Mr. Marier replied that the P &Z felt that the buffer zone did nothing to enhance the entire <br />community and they had considered the cost of maintainance. IMr. Marier then announced <br />that he was leaving the meeting, that he had presented his report and he felt that when <br />the Council was ready to work as a Council and not be ruled by a developer then he would <br />return. Mr. Marier teft the Council Chambers at 8:55 P. M. Since two Councilmen were <br />absent, there was not a quorum left therefore no legal action could be taken. IMr. <br />Bohjanen suggested that we continue the meeting as an informative meeting. <br />Mr. Johnson said that he had bought his house because it was on the golf course, because <br />of the Country Club, the beach, the marina, in short he had bought a package and know they <br />had none of these things and if this plat is approved then they will not have a golf course. <br />He felt that he had been taken. <br />Mr. Busch said he had no answer for a question of that sort put in such an argumanative manner <br />Platt #3 is an answer to moving forward. Also the residents' problems are with the Company <br />and is a private matter not be handled at a meeting such as this. This area was re- designed <br />to meet the cost of assessment. <br />Mr. Zelinka wanted to clear the record on the way he felt. He has not made up his mind <br />and he doesn't make up his mind until he had all the facts. His questions to Mr. Marier <br />were merely to get more information. <br />Mr. Busch said the Company was agreeable to setting up another meeting at any date <br />convenient with the Council. It is mandatory that this be done as soon as possi ble if it <br />is to be put on the tax rolls for 1973. Also they cannot build model homes until the plat <br />is approved. Since there is about 90 days from start to finish on a home, this put their <br />showing of models off until sometime in February. <br />