Laserfiche WebLink
5/24/71 <br />described parcel: That part of the NE 1 /4_o_ th . <br />a_ _ of Section 33 wnshii 31, <br />Range 22 Anoka ount }dinne <br />•w44 to -wit; Beginn a_t_ the <br />Southeast corner of sair 114 of 5 -1/4 the Northalong the East 1jne thereof, <br />for 930 feet to the_point of beginning of the tract of land'_ to be hereby described; <br />thence eontipue North_on.the..same_course for 175 feet; _ thence West parallel with <br />with the South line of said NE 1j of SW 1/4 _QfSW 1/4 198 feet; thence South <br />paral1^ _ ,vith the described first course, for 175 feet; thence East, parallel* <br />The rezoning hearing for Keith Apitz was called to order at 8:32 P.M. Mr. <br />Cardinal reported that Mr. Apitz had been at the P&Z meeting, but that he had <br />not quite complied with Ord. 21C, that a few things were missing. Mr. Tom <br />Van Housen had suggested in a letter what was needed. Mr. Apitz had presented <br />a cheek for $100 at the P&Z meeting, and would have the balance of what was <br />needed for compliance at the next P&Z meeting on the 16th of June. Mr. Cardinal <br />moved to continue the Apitz hearing before the P&Z on June 16th and before the <br />Council on June 28th at the same time. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Carried <br />unanimously. <br />Mr. Cardinal moved to close the Apitz hearing at 8 :34 P.M. Seconded by-Mi. <br />Rosengren. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Cardinal reported that Don Lund of 3M National Adv. had requested the P&Z <br />grant a variance to the sign ordinance on the Fran Burgue land for a 3rd sign <br />1100 feet from an existing sign. The P&Z had recommended denying the request <br />since the distance was short 100 feet and because the location was less than <br />500 feet from the next house. Mr. Cardinal moved to deny this variance request <br />by 3M National Adv. on the Burque property for the following reasons: 1) that <br />it did not comply with the 1200 foot space requirement, and 2) that it did not <br />comply with the 500 foot requirement from a residence, also that the Clerk send <br />a letter stating same to Mr. Burque with a carbon copy to Mr. Lund. Seconded <br />by Mr. Jaworski. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Cardinal stated that Mr. Fred Memmer, representing WCCO radio, had presented <br />a petition for a special use permit for a 900,foot replacement tower for the <br />one in Anoka, this tower to be built on the Lundgren property west of Holly <br />Drive. Mr. Rosengren noted an error in the P&Z minutes, namely that it said <br />9000 feet. Mr. Locher stated that this did not require a rezoning, and would <br />be allowed under Ord. 6 if a special use permit is issued under the public <br />utilities service section. The accompanying building would be small. Mr. <br />Cardinal noted, that in contrast with the small taxes paid on the telephone <br />tower, this tower would bring in a considerable amount. <br />After some, discussion, Mr. Cardinal moved to set a hearing for a special use <br />permit for the- WCCO radio tower at 9 P.M. before the P&Z on June 16th and the <br />Council meeting on June 28th. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Carried unanimously. <br />The Clerk inquired about a conflict in time scheduling since the Zoning District <br />.Ordinance is also scheduled for those. evenings. .Mr. Locher stated that it was <br />no problem as long as the hearings were not called early; they can be called <br />later than scheduled, whenever convenient. <br />The Clerk read the list of liquor license applications which had been received, <br />noting that the 49 Club had not submitted applications. Mr. L'Allier advised <br />her to send a letter to them advising them of the time limit by the State, and <br />that if clearance is not received in time from the State, we may holdup their <br />licenses. The Clerk noted that the off -sale applications needed signatures by <br />the Fire Marshall. Mr. Rosengren noted an error in his bond on the date of <br />expiration. <br />* with described second course, for 198 feet to the point of beginning. <br />Subject to any existing easements, covenants or restrictions. Seconded by <br />Ur. Rosengren. Carried unanimously. (Corrected description authorized at <br />the November 8, 1971 meeting. <br />