Laserfiche WebLink
double -entry system, but that most smaller Villages used the cash basis of <br />accounting instead, noting that our system is adequate and well -kept. He <br />stated that he was not an advocate of double -entry since it does increase the <br />work load and is harder to understand. The Clerk noted that she had been <br />asked. several times during the year to provide the amounts of money which <br />various funds had yet to spend for the year, particularly in the Roads and <br />Civil Defense funds. She thought an accrual balance might be kept for this <br />purpose. Wally agreed. The general feeling was that separate budgetary <br />accounts might be kept for a trial period, but that it would be premature to <br />begin a complete double entry - system now. Mr. Hill felt that the status of <br />the budget for each fund might be released monthly on columnar paper. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved that effective January 1, 1972, the Clerk- Treasurer be <br />authorized to begin keeping accrual budgetary accounts so as not to be <br />against State statutes,.and also to purchase a binder to keep these records in. <br />Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. Carried unanimously. <br />The matter of setting up additional fund accounts to keep track of the bond <br />sale money, construction of sewer and water utilities, hookup fees and <br />assessments was discussed. Mr. Cardinal moved to set up separate funds for <br />the following: <br />1.. A fund for the sewer hookup fees to pay off the balance of the <br />Metro Sewer Board assessment; <br />2. A fund for the sewer and water assessments to pay off the bond and <br />interest on the $550,000 Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1971; <br />3. A fund for the monies received from the above bonds to pay off the <br />construction of the sewer and water improvements. <br />Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Carried unanimously. <br />The discussion turned to determing the levy limitation. Mr. Hill stated <br />that he had consulted with the manager of Columbia Heights who was working <br />on their levy, and had received considerable information. He stated that we <br />would receive the usual per capita funds from cigarette, liquor and mobile <br />home taxes in 1972. The amount of State aids to be received in 1972 is <br />$48,463.07. The estimated 1971 population figure from the Metro Council was <br />3,801. Mr. Hill determined that the amount which Lino Lakes would need to <br />levy in 1972 would be $102,625 which included levies for bonded indebtedness <br />in the amount of $22,000. After working through Form No. 279 from the State <br />it was determined that Lino Lakes could levy $100,019 exclusive of special <br />levies and assessments. Mr. Hill stated that we were thus on safe ground <br />with our budget as previously determined. Based on the new assessed valuation <br />figure of $1,828,654 received from the County as of Nov. 15th, the mill rate <br />will be approximately 56.1 mills in 1972. <br />Following general discussion Mr. Jaworski moved to tentatively accept the <br />revised Page 3 and summary page of the 1972 budget to reflect the increase in <br />State aids, giving final approval if the figures tally with the additional <br />information yet to be received from the State. Seconded by Mr. Rosengren. <br />Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Hill felt we should wait until the meeting of the 27th to certify the <br />budget. Mr. Jaworski moved to withdraw the previous motion and to move that <br />Lino Lakes re- certify this budget contingent on no additional figures or change <br />being received from the State. Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Jaworski felt that some of the State aids should go into the Parks fund. <br />The Clerk requested that the Council take action on approving the minutes of <br />the November 22nd meeting so that she might put them in the permanent record. <br />