Laserfiche WebLink
192 <br />2/28/72 <br />Mr. Marier moved to amend Ordinance 31 by changing the wording of Sect. 2, Subd <br />5 to include that an "On sale" or an "Off sale" license may be issued to two <br />separate persons for two separate premises, and that an "On sale" license may <br />be issued to businesses which also serve food. This was discussed. Mr. Marier <br />stated that he doesn't want on and off sale licesnes together unless they have <br />two separate buildings. Mr. Rosengren stated that the State law won't allow a <br />person to have licenses for separate buildings; Mr. Locher thought husband and <br />wife could hold 2 different licenses. Mrs. Swanson seconded the motion. Vote - <br />Jaworski--No; Marier- -Yes; Swanson- -Yes; Bohjanen - -No. Tie vote. <br />Mr. Bohjanen wanted more clarification as to whether this would have to be for <br />separate buildings or 2 separate businesses in the same building. Mr. Marier <br />said they could have 2 separate entrances with separate addresses. Mr. Bohjanen <br />asked if joint partnership could own both. Mr. Locher thought it would be <br />impractical to issue insurance to each one. Mrs. Gould wondered if 50 applic- <br />ants came in for off sale licenses if we would have to issue licenses to each <br />one; Mr. Locher said No. Mrs. Gould felt we should set limitations on how many <br />we issue; she felt the Oasis and Hank's Cate are too close together; she thought <br />an ordinance could regulate the number and distance apart future liquor licenses <br />might be. <br />Mr. Marier gave his reasons as not wanting both licenses housed under one roof <br />and, regarding trying to get future development in here, anyone who owns a lic- <br />ense now is a deterrent to big businesses coming in, thinking on a tax basis. <br />It is not fair to a man, and how could we get a man to come in and build such <br />a building. Licenses are primarily a source for the Village to get money and <br />we should try to attract other people to build. Mr. Marier read the wording he <br />preferred; Mr. Locher added a definition of premises to be included. Mr. Rosen - <br />gren commented that the Council took the long way of saying that he didn't get <br />a license; he felt that this was a personal thing on Mr. Marier's part; this <br />was denied. Mr. Rosengren stated that no one could operate an off sale business <br />in this Village and make money - he had tried. Mr. Marier stated that one <br />place does. Mr. Rosengren countered that that one gets his business from a- <br />nother village and has a body shop next door to make a living. There was more <br />discussion on the wording of the amendment. <br />Mr. Marier moved to adopt amending Ordinance No. 31D with the revised wording. <br />Seconded by Mrs. Swanson. Mr. Jaworski asked if this ordinance needed a hear- <br />ing and was told No. The Clerk asked for clarification - foes this mean that <br />we definitely cannot issue an on and an off sale license to the same person if <br />he owns both premises; this was correct. Vote: Jaworski - -No; Marier- -Yea; <br />Swanson- -Yes; Bohjanen - -Yes. Motion carried. Mr. Locher stated that this <br />would be published on Friday. It was declared that due to the adoption of this <br />amendment that we cannot put Henry Rosengren's off sale liquor license appli- <br />cation on the next agenda. <br />Mrs. Swanson asked Mr. Myhre what Richard Roberts had done in conjunction with <br />his hog farm and the stipulations put on it. Mary said that he had not seen . <br />any hogs nor had any complaints; however, he had not been on the premises. Mrs. <br />Swanson noted that his was to have been on the agenda within 60 days of the original <br />hearing in November on the hog feeding and phasing out of the garbage. Mr. Locher <br />said he will ask the County Officers to give us a report on this. <br />Mrs. Swanson wished to refresh the memory of the members, that in the January <br />expenditures $741.81 was spent for cleaning the parks in January. Mr. Jaworski <br />stated that the Glenn Rehbein item was not for cleaning the rinks but for grad- <br />ing <br />1Iwork done before January. Mrs. Swanson said that of the total Parks pay- <br />roll h7, .80 %hwasfoaiiid to 1 family; she had not included Cliff Hagen's <br />$499 was for the same personnel to clean the <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />