My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/16/1976 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1976
>
11/16/1976 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2014 11:13:00 AM
Creation date
12/19/2014 1:43:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/1976
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 16, 1976 <br />IIIMaking only two lines necessary. Mr. Zelinka said these homes would have to go under <br />Sunset to hook up and that costs about $40.00 per foot. Mr. Cooper said there are no <br />sewers on Sunset, just laterals and storm sewers. <br />Mr. Randy Ringaman, 6833 Rustic Lane, asked, if all the utilities are put in the streets, <br />will the streets then be upgraded? at a certain width? Mr. Carley said, Yes, the str- <br />eets would be paved with curbs and gutters. <br />Mr. Gardner, 7172 Sunrise, asked what the cost would be if the utilities are put in the <br />street and the entire project done? Mr. Schneider wondered what the cost would be to <br />the City if the sewers are put in the streets in reference to the footage of Sunrise <br />Park? <br />Mr. Carley said if the entire project is constructed the cost is $1.9 million dollars - <br />approximately $6,900.00 per 125' lot; just sewer in the street - $1,090 million dollars - <br />approximately $4,300.00 per 125' lot; sewers in the rear - $730,000 dollars - approxim- <br />ately $2,800.00 per 125' lot. <br />Mr. Truman, 7173 Sunrise, felt the cost of installing the sewers in the rear of the <br />lot lines would be-just as costly as putting the lines in the front. He was concerned <br />about the long line necessary to connect to the sewer line in the back and the problems <br />of keeping that line open. <br />Mr. Carley was asked if these estimates are on the low side and he told the people that <br />IIIhis firm makes estimates such as these on the high side and he pointed out the Center - <br />ville bids came in about $200,000.00 under the estimated cost computed by his firm. <br />There were many people who did not want to sell the back portion of their lots and there- <br />fore felt this would not benefit them. They would perfer the utilities in the street. <br />Mr. Clare felt the figures had been presented and felt that a count should be taken on <br />who wants what. <br />Mr. Zelinka asked who wanted all the utilities in the street - approximate count - 31; <br />who wanted just the sewer in the front - 4; in the back - 0; who wanted nothing - 21. <br />Mr. Munchou asked, if the streets were put along the back of the lots,would there be <br />a hearing of all people notified and he was told, Yes. <br />Mr. Ringaman felt this area is in reports as being a probi;em area. He felt the system <br />would save money in the long run in that the people could put the system in at their <br />option and not be forced to by the PCA. <br />Mr. Howard James asked when there would be knowledge on Federal Funds being available? <br />Mr. Carley said there are no Federal Funds except for the construction of treatment <br />plants and interceptors. <br />Someone asked when the construction would take place and how long it would take. Mr. <br />Carley said if the plans and specifications are ordered now, bids would probably be in <br />around the first of March, the construction would be done in the summer of 1977 and the <br />IIIassessments would be placed on the tax rolls for payment in 1978. <br />Mr. James suggested delaying this for six months to investigate the Federal Fund Quest- <br />ion question. Mr. James asked when the project would then be completed and Mr. Carley <br />said, a year later and the costs would have gone up as a result of the current inflat- <br />ion trend. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.