Laserfiche WebLink
August 22, 1977 <br />Mr. Arlan LeTourneau appeared before the Council protesting the cost of a building permit. <br />He presented the Council with copies of a permit for a garage and a fireplace and compared <br />the costs to the building permit costs for the installation of a deck. He also objected <br />to the pre- inspection charge levied by the Building Inspector. <br />Mr. Zelinka arrived at 8:35 P.M. <br />Mr. Mobley said the building was completed without a permit and is in violation of the <br />State Building Code. This code also sets the pre - inspection fee and all charges are acc- <br />ording to this code. Part of the cost is the pre- inspection fee and part is for a build- <br />ing permit. Mr. Mobley said he had made five trips to that home and found no one home at <br />any time. He had redtagged the sturcture with no results and had felt the only way to get <br />action was by a court summons. <br />Mr. LeTourneau said he did the constructionon the 28th of May and did not get a ticket <br />until the 6th of August. He admitted building without a permit but said he did not know <br />a building permit was necessary. He still felt he was being overcharged for the permit. <br />Mr. Mobley listed the violations in building the garage, the fireplace and deck and said <br />he would not withdraw the complal nt. <br />Mr. Karth and Mr. McLean had done some computations on the square footage and arrived at <br />a figure of $13.65 for the permit instead of $21.00. Mr. Karth moved to reduce the permit <br />fee to $13.65. Seconded by Mr. Schneider. Motion carried with Mr. McLean and Mr. Zelinka <br />abstaining. <br />Mr. Locher pointed out the complaint signed against Mr. LeTourneau was for failure to ob- <br />tain a building permit. Mr. LeTourneau admitted this but said he would not get a permit <br />because he felt he was being overcharged. <br />Mr. Locher said the Council could make a recommendation to Mr. Mobley the same as to a <br />Police Officer. <br />Mr. McLean felt the court costs are too much for the little that would be received but <br />felt the reduced building permit fee and the reinspection fee is fair. <br />Mr. Schneider moved to recommend to the Judge to dismiss the case. Mr. Zelinka seconded <br />the motion. Motion carried with Mr. McLean abstaining. <br />Mr. Karth said the fee of $13.65 plus a pre - instection fee of $15.00 is the amount due. <br />The Council agreed and Mr. LeTourneau left a check in that amount with the Clerk. <br />Mr. Locher said that some communities have the stipulation that if a building is started <br />without a permit the fee is doubled. He thought perhaps the Council might want to study <br />this provision in order to support the Building Inspector. <br />Mr. Marlin Hansen felt he had had some of the same problems with the Building Inspector. <br />He felt Mr. Mobley is too harsh and antagonizes people. <br />Mr. Mobley felt this is the first time a Council had intervened with a citation. This <br />citation was written according to State Law and he will not hold hands with people who <br />break the law - he will help and advise. <br />Mayor Bohjanen called the Public Hearing on Carole's Estates to order at 9:30 P.M. Mr. <br />Locher read the notice of publication as it was published in the Forest Lake Times. <br />