My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/1970 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1970
>
03/10/1970 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2014 3:42:22 PM
Creation date
12/22/2014 3:01:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1970
Council Meeting Type
Joint
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John McLean, Planning & Zoning Chairman, was asked for his views, to be followed by <br />comments from the rest of the Planning & Zoning members. Mr. McLean stated that <br />he felt that the position of the Planning & Zoning Board was: 1) that Lino Lakes not <br />consider any more mobile home sites under any circumstances until we have municipal <br />sewer and water; and 2) they feel a reluctance to have mobile home parks in any <br />quantity until it can be demonstrated that such parks can carry their share of the tax <br />burden; this based on the fact that mobile homes have a low starting cost and rapid <br />depreciation compared to houses which start high and appreciate in value; and 3) there <br />is no adequate way to control the population of school children in a mobile home park <br />by administration of laws. Mr. Jaworski commented that he didn't feel we could ever <br />control the number of children in a mobile home park since mobile homes are the only <br />means of shelter for many newly married couples. <br />Mr. Ed Karth stated that he doesn't consider mobile homes to be low cost when you <br />consider the cost per month plus hookup fees for the court besides the owner paying <br />for 7 years on a home that might last a maximum of 15 years. W. L'Allier noted that <br />there are not many homes for sale in the $20,000 category; W. McLean disputed this. <br />Mr. James Hill proffered a newspaper clipping commenting on the hardship of schools <br />in low -tax base areas of heavy growth; emergency school aid was approved to many. <br />Mr. Hill felt that we should first consider how mobile home courts will affect the <br />schools. <br />W. Glenn Rehbein ofjected to the lack of sewage systems for proposed courts, Menk- <br />leld's in particular. Mr. Rehbein stated that the Youth Center is running sewage through <br />the creek and adding on the trailer court can't be considered. It would be a different <br />story if there were city sewer and water. He also mentioned the lack of a tax base. <br />Mr. McLean mentioned the meeting held at Forst Lake Schools -- it had been suggested <br />there that a trailer court of 500 units adding 1,000 voters could make quite an <br />impact on the political life of a community of our size. These people could control <br />the politics and services but don't Own any land to pay taxes on. <br />There was some general discussion on communities having no industrial areas, only <br />homes. <br />Superintendent Hankerson of Centennial Schools stated that he appreciated having been <br />invited to the meeting, that any mobile home courts in our area of course affect <br />District #12 greatly. He stated that a few years ago there were no kids from trailer <br />parks giving an example that in 1967 there were only 137 kids from 3300 trailers and <br />in 1970, there were 284 kids from 3500 trailers. <br />Mr. Hankerson gave statistics on the state aid and mill levy, as well as the depreci- <br />ation on trailers as follows: <br />MOBILE HOME TAX BREAKDOWN <br />Tax Dispersement: <br />Depreciation Schedule: <br />Model Formula Criteria. <br />170 - 10% <br />1969 - 8.5% <br />1968 - 7.5% <br />1967 - 6.5% <br />1966 - 5% <br />Formula: Mobile Home Tax <br />Factory List Price x Model x Fixed Mill Rate <br />50% - School District <br />30% - Municipality <br />10% - County. <br />10% - General Revenue Fund <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.