My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/24/1970 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1970
>
09/24/1970 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2014 11:59:41 AM
Creation date
12/23/2014 9:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1970
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
194 <br />$6,720 which can be taken off the $19,400 assessment; these combined figures leave <br />an amount of $7,680 to be levied for the building bond. <br />The Metropolitan Sewer Assessment was discussed. Mr. Gotwald is at present trying <br />to meet with Metro representatives to determine if our assessment is fair. If <br />so, then the amount of $25,712.58 must be paid in 12 equal installments next <br />year. This amount was included in the levy; however, if a different amount should <br />result from Mr. Gotwald's discussions, a new budget meeting will be called to <br />finalize the levy and mill rate. <br />These are the tentative results on the levy, pending any change in the sewer levy; <br />a total amount of $143,148 to be levied at a mill rate of 83 mills on an assessed <br />valuation of some $1,720,000. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved to adjuurn the meeting at 9:57 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. <br />Carried unanimously. <br />Minutes approved at the meeting of October 13, 1970— R-i"4°'_' <br />Clerk- reasurer <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Village Council held on September 14, 1970 <br />was called to order at 9:43 p.m. by Mayor L'Allier with all members present. <br />Mr. Cardinal moved to accept the minutes of the August 24th meeting as written. <br />Seconded by Mr. Rosengren. Motion carried with Mr. Bohjanen abstaining because of <br />his absence at that meeting. <br />The Clerk read a notice of designation of a haul road for County Road No. 84 from <br />Main Street to the South County Line. Copies of the proposed County park ordinance <br />and other letters from Mr. Burman had already been received by the Council. The <br />Clerk reported that $1,791 had been received in mobile home property taxes; <br />municipal court fines in the amount of $8.00 had also been received. Two separate <br />letters had been received from Burstein & Reidenberg who are handling the municipal <br />court property: the first had enclosed a check in the amount of $194.70 for such <br />sale, and the second stated that the books which were to have been sold for $5.00 <br />could not be located and no disposition of them would be made. <br />The Clerk stated that the first third of the money invested in treasury bills had <br />matured on September 3; she had been advised to reinvest them since no bill had been <br />received from Mattson at that time. However, a subsequent billing from Mattson in <br />the amount of $11,602 had been received, and the Clerk inquired whether she should <br />hold the bill or cash in the treasury bills immediately. Mr. Bohjanen moved that <br />the check for Mattson be held until October 1st when the bills will mature. <br />Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. Carried unanimously. <br />A letter from the Metropolitan Sewer Board accompanying the bill for 1971 costs <br />to be paid was received. The billing was read, showing the amount of $25,712.58 <br />to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments next year. Mr. Gotwald stated that <br />he had been unable to meet yet with the Sewer Board officials; however, he had <br />checked the report of Black & Veetch, Engineer and had been unable to find anything <br />on Lino Lakes in the book. Mr. Gotwald recommended that we table the matter until <br />he is able to contact the officials and then meet with W. Carley and himself. <br />Mr. L'Allier stated that we need an explanation where the cost comes from. Mr. <br />L'Allier wished to go on record recommending that the Council request postponement <br />of the $25,000 plus assessment for one year because there was not enough time to <br />study the matter and 15 mills is too much to add onto our budget for one year for <br />one assessment. W. L'Allier then moved to postpone the payment for one year <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.