Laserfiche WebLink
S6 <br />3/8/71 <br />Clarence Johnson of the U of M, an official of the Wildlife Dept. stated that <br />he had talked with Mr. VanHousen and the Conservation Dept., and that <br />he had received the impression that the area on the map was the only <br />area under condideration. Mr. L'Allier noted that if we decided we <br />wanted the perk on some of the lands in that area,wey would indicate hands <br />off certain portions of the area. W. Johnson noted that Mr. VanHousen <br />feels that by putting this area into parks we would raise the value of <br />surrounding land; also, he feels that VanHousen isn't aware of how the <br />Council feels about omitting some of the area. Mr. L'Allier stated that this <br />was not true, that he had talked with Mr. VanHousen, we held meetings with <br />him, also given him a charge to come up with details for presentation <br />to the Metro people. <br />Marcel Rivard inquired whether this park was only in Anoka County. Mr. <br />L'Allier stated, "Yes ", that the Metro Parks Board had a charge to come <br />up with several areas for parks, but this was only in Anoka County. Mr. <br />L'Allier also noted that we are conservation- minded, but birds don't pay <br />taxes. <br />Mr. Gotwald replied to a question that the 6700 acres being considered was <br />about 1/4 of the 23,000 acres in Lino Lakes. He stated that the area included <br />about 4500 acres total(including water) that was not developable. Also, of the <br />remaining land in the Village a considerable amount was owned by the State, <br />etc., and could not be developed. Someone asked how close to the West <br />side of Centerville Lake the park went and was told that it went right <br />up to the lake but this was one area we would want deleted. <br />Mr. Al Ross commented that the long -range plans included the whole Rice <br />Creek chain. Jerry Boyd inquired whether the Rondeau Lake area was included <br />and was told that 35W was the boundary. <br />A lady asked what happens to the homes in the area. Mr. Jaworski replied <br />that if the Park Board needed the property right away they would buy out <br />the owner. If not, they would allow the people to live in the home the <br />rest of their life. She asked if the State would give market value for the <br />homes. Mr. Locher explained how just compensation under eminent domain <br />was arrived at. Mr. Jaworski commented that they won't chase anyone out <br />right away. It may take 20 years to develop the park and will be done in <br />phases. <br />Mr. L'Allier noted that the very existence of the Metro Park Board's <br />legality was in question. He stated that of the 2 million dollars appropriated <br />for them out of the 1c/ gas tax, they only had 1/2 million left. He mentioned <br />the various bills again, and noted that if the park is allowed, we must de- <br />cide what the tax income from that property taken is worth. <br />There,were a few more comments and discussion. Mr. Rosengren inquired <br />whether other entities besides the Village, County and Metro had to meet <br />on this. W. L'Allier noted that the County seemed to be waiting for the <br />Metro to do something, and vice versa. We had received nothing definite <br />from the County only vague thoughts, but we want their input. It seems <br />that the County doesn't wish to spend any money on parks of the Metro is <br />.going to take it over. Mr. L'Allier noted that we can help keep the Metro <br />in control by taking action ourselves. <br />Jim Bernier asked when they would try to finalize the boundaries. Mr. <br />L'Allier stated that they hoped to in 30 days while the Legislature is <br />still in session. A man from Columbus asked what policing control there <br />