Laserfiche WebLink
Norm Miller asked Mr. Locher if this agreement would be binding on future Councils. <br />He answered yes, a franchise would be as it will be an ordinance. He men- <br />tioned isolated instances where trouble may arise. <br />Mr. Bohjanen pointed out one word in the minutes of May 15 which was not the same <br />as the word in the water franchise agreement. Page 5, article 6. The minutes <br />state the word 'shall' should be changed to the word 'may'. Mr. L'Allier thought <br />this would be a disadvantage to the Council and Mr. Locher said itis an absolute <br />directive. The other three councilmen agreed it should be left as 'shall' in <br />the franchise, but no ruling was made on the matter. <br />Mr. L'Allier stated the question facing us is two -fold: <br />1) We request the Company to contact PCA and sollicit an indication, <br />preferably in writing, their feelings of the construction of a treatment plant <br />according to the specifications and standards set forth by the PCA. or <br />2) The Council could proceed to act on the franchise this evening. <br />Mr. Bohjanen moved to set July 28 for a date of reviewal of the franchise agreement <br />presented by the U.S. Lake Development Company. By- this date the Company should <br />contact the Pollution Control Agency and get an indication in writing of the PCA's <br />feelings toward the construction of a treatment plant on the Rice Cteek Chain, <br />either favorable or unfavorable and report back to the Council, perhaps through <br />the Engineer. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. L'Allier asked Mr. Busch if this was sufficient time. He answered yes, but <br />still desired some indication from the Council which they could pass on to the <br />PCA. Mr. L'Allier said they could not give any indication and stated that request= <br />ing an indication from the PCA did not give any indication whether the Council <br />would act favorably or unfavorably only that they would review the matter on <br />July 28th. Mr. L'Allier instructed the Clerk to inform the Company by letter of <br />the above decision. <br />At this time Mr. Busch asked if the water franchise couldn't be considered entirely <br />separate from the sewer franchise. Mr. L'Allier asked if he meant they would put <br />water in at this time and sewer later. Mr. Busch answered no - -only the engineering <br />part of it•could be done now and they would work on the sewer engineering at the <br />same time to conserve time. Mr. L'Allier inquired about the estimated cost and <br />Mr. Dielentheis answered they were not sure about the size yet. Mr. L'Allier <br />stated they could still install a private water system even if the sewer franchise <br />doesn't go through. Mr. Busch said yes to this and also that they wanted to in- <br />stall pipes before the streets are finished. Mr. L'Allier asked the Council if <br />they wished that we proceed to act upon the water franchise knowing we may or <br />may not go thru with the Newer franchise. <br />Mr. Gotwald makde it very clear that he does not look forward to this development <br />putting in private wells and private spetic tanks. He indicated that the Village <br />must get involved with the franchise. Mr. Rosengren said he was in favor of the <br />water franchise and Mr. Gotwald said there are less problems with water froAm an <br />engineering standpoint. <br />Mr. Gotwald pointed out that approving the franchise does not bind them at this <br />time as the plans have to be approved by the State Board of Health and by the <br />Council. <br />