Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MEETING MAY 26, 1992 <br />Mr. Schneider said that the Council could delay action on <br />Resolution No. 92 - 70. However, it should be implemented before <br />the moratorium is lifted. Council Member Bergeson said that <br />since the City is in a moratorium, the only thing being <br />considered at this time is one (1) single family residence at a <br />time. He said he would feel more comfortable seeing all the <br />financial data on the Plan and not just the fee schedule and <br />would like action on the resolution delayed. Council Member <br />Bergeson said he would like additional time to see if the fee <br />schedule is excessive at this point in time and will it have a <br />negative impact on development. <br />Mayor Reinert said that the City Council made a commitment to a <br />program and the program is running in the red. Mr. Schneider <br />said that the resolution can be amended at any time if it is <br />determined that the rate is not appropriate. Mr. Schumacher said <br />that Step I has been completed. Steps II and III are expensive <br />and the fund is running in the red. He noted that the Sections <br />18 and 19 improvement cost more than $65,000.00 and no easements <br />have yet been acquired. Mr. Schneider said he would have more <br />information in late summer or early fall that will give the City <br />Council a better idea of how the Plan is operating. He explained <br />that it is his intent to pay for the Plan in about two (2) years. <br />His figures' are based on work done south of the metro area and <br />felt that the numbers were not excessive. <br />Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 92 - 70 <br />Establishing Surface Water Management Charges. Council Member <br />Neal seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked how much money expended is project <br />specific and how much is for the entire City. Mr. Schneider said <br />that in a specific project, the developer pays about one half <br />(1/2) and earns credit for the other half. This Plan meets <br />project costs only. Council Member Bergeson asked if people who <br />develop in the next year will pay for the entire Plan. Mr. <br />Schneider said no, a water quality plan must also 'be prepared. <br />Council Member Bergeson said he did not disagree with the need <br />for a plan, he was concerned that the City does not overcharge <br />initially and stop development. <br />Voting on the motion, motion carried with Council Member Bergeson <br />voting no. <br />Change Order, Pheasant Hills, Second Addition - In the summer of <br />1991 during construction of Pheasant Hills Preserve, First <br />Addition, the developer Ed Vaughn asked that the City consider <br />extending sanitary sewer and water services westerly beyond the <br />first addition toward the Centennial School property. Watermain <br />and forcemain had already been installed in this street alignment <br />PAGE 16 <br />45 <br />