Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MEETING MAY 26, 1992 <br />the Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed a request to build one <br />(1) single family dwelling on the Outlot. Variances are needed <br />for lot width and for construction of a private driveway on the <br />public right -of -way. <br />Council Member Bergeson said he understood that when these two <br />(2) outlots were platted, it was understood that at some point in <br />the future the lots would be platted and developed. Mr. <br />Schneider agreed and said a "ghost plat" had been provided for <br />the outlots. <br />Council Member Neal moved to approve the variances and site plan <br />as submitted with execution of the driveway agreement prepared by <br />the City Attorney. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, APOLLO DRIVE IMPROVEMENT <br />Mr. Schneider explained that because of an error in the notice <br />procedure the original public hearing was held but another public <br />hearing was scheduled to comply with the notice procedure. On <br />April 13, 1992 the City Council ordered the preparation of plans <br />for the project and responded to questions from the public. A <br />special informational meeting was held on March 30, 1992. There <br />have been other meetings and discussions with the business <br />property owners and the Correctional Facility officials. <br />Recently there was an informal informational meeting at city hall <br />for all the property owners in the area both business and <br />residential at which time alternate roadway configurations were <br />discussed. <br />The Minnesota Department of Corrections has submitted a letter to <br />the City relative to the impact of the project on the Lino Lakes <br />Correctional Facility. The letter explains the reluctance of the <br />officials to publicly discuss some of the impacts of the <br />improvement in more detail. <br />Mr. Schneider used the overhead projector and showed various <br />alternatives that have been developed. He noted the properties <br />that are proposed to be assessed and noted that if Apollo Drive <br />becomes a county state aid road, the right -of -way width must be <br />150 feet and the roadway must be 52 feet wide. He also explained <br />that if Apollo Drive were to remain a city state aid street, the <br />right -of -way would be 60 feet and the roadway must be 44 feet <br />wide. Mr. Schneider gave a cost summary of the improvement and <br />explained that if the street becomes a county state aid street, <br />County Municipal State Aid funds will be received in the amount <br />of approximately $2,000,000.00. The balance of the cost of the <br />improvement would be assessed to the benefiting property owners. <br />PAGE 6 <br />35 <br />