My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/25/1993 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1993
>
10/25/1993 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2015 3:52:04 PM
Creation date
1/12/2015 2:58:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/25/1993
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2c, <br />COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1993 <br />Wyland used the overhead projector and located the lot where a <br />variance is requested. The property is located in the Quail <br />Ridge plat and was one of the first lots to be built on. When <br />the building permit was issued, a certificate of survey indicated <br />that the garage side of the house was located five (5) feet from <br />the side property line as required by the Zoning Ordinance. <br />However, upon completion of the dwelling, an "as -built" survey <br />indicated that the house was actually four (4) feet, three (3) <br />inches from the side property line. This encroaches seven (7) <br />inches into both the side yard setback and a drainage easement. <br />To provide a clear and unclouded title to the property, the <br />builder has requested that a variance be issued. <br />The property owner and builder, Bill Pierce of Pierce & <br />Associates is also the property owner of the lot immediately to <br />the west of this subject property. Therefore, a letter <br />indicating no objections from the adjoining property owner has <br />not been requested. <br />Variances may be granted in instances where the strict <br />enforcement would cause undo hardship because of circumstances <br />unique to the individual property under consideration. Staff <br />recommended the approval of the variance request based on the <br />following findings of fact: <br />1. The property in question cannot be put to use for other than <br />single family purposes. <br />2. The plight of the landowner (actually the future landowner, <br />as the builder is requesting this variance) is due to <br />circumstances not of his making and the variance is <br />necessary to provide clear title to the property. <br />3. The hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and <br />a reasonable use of the property does exist under the terms <br />of the ordinance. <br />4. Granting of the variance will not confer on the applicant <br />any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance <br />to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />5. The proposed action will not unreasonably diminish or impair <br />established property values within the neighborhood. <br />6. The proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance as the area is zoned for single <br />family development. <br />PAGE 2 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.