My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/1994 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1994
>
06/27/1994 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2015 2:16:46 PM
Creation date
1/15/2015 10:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/1994
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 27, 1994 <br />Member Elliott asked why both concepts were not available for the <br />Planning and Zoning Board to study. Mr. Corson explained that <br />his engineer was busy and unable to get the information for that <br />meeting. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to return the Trappers Crossing plat <br />to the Planning and Zoning Board for further consideration after <br />the developer shows them the difference between the two (2) <br />concept plans. She noted that the City Council is leaning toward <br />the PDO concept because the City would have more control over the <br />actual development. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Council Member Kuether asked if the plat was presented at the <br />June Planning and Zoning Board for the second time. Mr. Corson <br />said it was the third time. Council Member Kuether asked if the <br />changes suggested by the Planning and Zoning Board incorporated <br />into the plat. Mr. Corson said some changes were made and he <br />felt that everything was done that could be done. <br />Acting Mayor Neal asked if the R -1X concept plan met all R -1X <br />requirements. Mr. Corson said yes. <br />Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. <br />CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, <br />PETER KLUEGEL <br />Mr. Kluegel explained that each year Conditional Use Permits <br />(CUP) are reviewed for compliance to required stipulations and <br />complaints received regarding their use. The CUP's have been <br />classified into three (3) categories: 1) presently active and in <br />compliance; 2) inactive and no longer in operation; and 3) those <br />that require further review and an amended CUP. Mr. Kluegel <br />explained that the amended CUP's will be brought before the City <br />Council for their approval. <br />Mr. Kluegel explained that the businesses that need further <br />review have either intensified their business or have outside <br />storage that would require a CUP. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to accept the report and <br />classification of CUP's. Council Member Elliott seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DARRELL SCHNEIDER <br />Mr. Schneider did not have a report. <br />PAGE 4 <br />24') <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.